McCain Recommends Voters Review His Record Via Nonprofits Linked to His Campaign


At Tuesday’s town hall-style presidential debate at Tennessee’s Belmont University, an audience member named Theresa Finch asked the candidates a question that has no doubt been weighing on the minds of many Americans: “How can we trust either of you with our money when both parties got us into this global economic crisis?” When it came time for McCain to respond, he said, “I can see why you feel that cynicism and mistrust, because the system in Washington is broken. And I have been a consistent reformer.” He said he had a clear record of taking on special interests and reaching across the aisle to get things done in Washington. “So let’s look at our records as well as our rhetoric,” he said. “That’s really part of your mistrust here. And now I suggest that maybe you go to some of these organizations that are the watchdogs of what we do, like the Citizens Against Government Waste or the National Taxpayers Union or these other organizations that watch us all the time.”

It’s not surprising that McCain directed Finch to Citizens Against Government Waste or the National Taxpayers Union. Both anti-spending organizations are ideologically aligned with the Arizona Senator and have ties to his presidential campaign. But if Finch were to take McCain’s advice and visit the NTU’s web site to look up its most recent congressional scorecard, she would find “N/A” next to the candidate’s name, for he didn’t vote on enough bills in the 110th Congress to qualify for a rating. (Obama receives an F. In past years, McCain’s NTU rating has ranged from B-minus to A.)

CAGW, however, gives McCain its highest marks—100 percent—in its latest report [PDF], though Finch and other voters may want to consider the source before placing stock in the nonprofit’s congressional scorecard. CAGW was one of five nonprofits accused by Senate investigators of “laundering payments and then disbursing funds” at the direction of Jack Abramoff. Earlier this year the Washington Post reported that CAGW was actively helping McCain.

When McCain came under fire last winter for supporting a $40 billion tanker deal that critics said would export thousands of jobs overseas, “McCain’s advisers wanted to strike back against key Democratic critics,” according to the Post. “But they did not mount an expensive advertising campaign to defend the candidate’s position.” Instead, they called CAGW, which “partnered with Northrop and one of its consultants to produce a vitriolic advertising campaign defending the tanker deal.”

McCain’s close friend Orson Swindle, who was the senator’s cellmate in the “Hanoi Hilton,” has served on the group’s board. And CAGW’s political arm has donated $11,000 to McCain’s campaign and political action committee since 2004—an amount that far surpasses its contributions to any other candidate. Just a day before McCain cited CAGW as one of the go-to watchdogs, the group’s political action committee began running ads in support of McCain in the swing states of Pennsylvania, Ohio, Florida, and Virginia. The 30-second spot, dubbed “Taxpayer Hero,” states: “In 25 years, McCain never requested a single pork barrel spending project. Not a dime in special interest earmarks. Barack Obama? $740 million in special interest earmarks in just 3 years. There’s nothing Washington’s tax-and-spend politicians fear more than John McCain in the White House.”

The National Taxpayers Union is also less than an impartial source on McCain. Several of its top honchos have donated generously to McCain’s campaign. And one of its board members, Edward Failor Jr., is a political operative who worked for McCain’s campaign in Iowa. Failor also serves on the board of the newly formed independent expenditure group, American Issues Project, which has spent millions on an ad campaign attacking Barack Obama for his connection to 1960s radical William Ayers. On Wednesday, the group announced a million dollar ad buy for a TV spot, which will run on Fox and CNN, blaming Democrats for the financial meltdown and for protecting the interests of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. “Who should you trust on the economy?” the ad asks.

This was precisely what Theresa Finch was wondering on Tuesday night. And CAGW and NTU are not the best places to go for answers.

OUR NEW CORRUPTION PROJECT

The more we thought about how MoJo's journalism can have the most impact heading into the 2020 election, the more we realized that so many of today's stories come down to corruption: democracy and the rule of law being undermined by the wealthy and powerful for their own gain.

So we're launching a new Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption. We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We'll publish what we find as a major series in the summer of 2020, including a special issue of our magazine, a dedicated online portal, and video and podcast series so it doesn't get lost in the daily deluge of breaking news.

It's unlike anything we've done before and we've got seed funding to get started, but we're asking readers to help crowdfund this new beat with an additional $500,000 so we can go even bigger. You can read why we're taking this approach and what we want to accomplish in "Corruption Isn't Just Another Scandal. It's the Rot Beneath All of Them," and if you like how it sounds, please help fund it with a tax-deductible donation today.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate