Military: No Afghan Embed for Rolling Stone Reporter

Mediabistro / <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlLA/journos/michael_hastings_dishes_on_dishing_98248.asp">Creative Commons</a>

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.


…Aaaaand we have revenge. The military today announced that Mike Hastings, the Rolling Stone freelancer and longtime war reporter who ended Gen. Stanley McChrystal’s career by, um, listening to stuff that happened and writing it down, will not be returning to Afghanistan anytime soon. His request for a September frontline embed, which had been previously approved, was suddenly rescinded by the unit’s commander, according to a DOD spokesman, Colonel David Lapan:

“There is no right to embed,” Lapan said. “It is a choice made between units and individual reporters, and a key element of an embed is having trust that the individuals are going to abide by the ground rules. So in that instance the command in Afghanistan decided there wasn’t the trust requisite and denied this request.”

Now, the military could have maybe welcomed Hastings to show they could let bygones be bygones…as well as to do some pushback against the WikiLeaks crowd by inviting a real, live reporter with a camera and junk out there to cover the “ground truth” by being, you know, on the ground. You’d think Bill Caldwell, the ISAF training commander who once ran the coalition’s public affairs machine in Iraq, would know that.

Or not.

Is the military’s explanation kosher? Not likely; the reasons why after the jump.

Is this merely a matter of some junior field commander declining to let Hastings come along for reasons more related to security than vengeance? Probably not; if a commander rejects an embedded reporter, senior military staff can always lean on the commander to take him back or, at very worst, offer the reporter another embed elsewhere in the theater. The Afghan brass did neither.

In fact, Hastings seems to imply he was booted because he refused to cooperate with a military investigation: Authorities are looking into the soldiers he’d interviewed for the Rolling Stone piece to determine if their comments violated regulations. “for the record, i declined to be interviewed and refused to participate in the army’s IG investigation,” he tweeted out to followers late Tuesday night.

Plus, there’s a disturbing precedent for Hastings’ treatment. Last year, US commanders in Iraq kicked Heath Druzin, a Stars & Stripes reporter, off an embed, ostensibly because he was a distraction to his host unit. But then an Army PR officer made the mistake of complaining in writing that Druzin’s reporting wasn’t sunny enough. “Despite the opportunity to visit areas of the city where Iraqi Army leaders, soldiers, national police and Iraqi police displayed commitment to partnership, Mr. Druzin refused to highlight any of this news,” she wrote to Druzin’s editorial director. Stripes then pulled out all the stops, calling the military’s move “an attempt at censorship and…also an illegal prior restraint under federal law.”

Incidentally, I was in the Baghdad public affairs shop when Druzin’s case came up, and I made an appeal on his behalf to one of the unit’s senior officers. Whatever his transgressions, I told this Army major, it had to be in the military’s best interest not to appear arbitrary or heavyhanded when handling civilian reporters. Besides, if the military was really angry about Druzin’s stories, didn’t they realize that kicking him off an embed simply gave those stories a ton more attention from the domestic public and his press colleagues?

In response, the major told me only one thing. “They’ve got to understand,” he said, “that embedding is a privilege and not a right.”

You can say this for the military: They know how to stay on message.

IT'S NOT THAT WE'RE SCREWED WITHOUT TRUMP:

"It's that we're screwed with or without him if we can't show the public that what we do matters for the long term," writes Mother Jones CEO Monika Bauerlein as she kicks off our drive to raise $350,000 in donations from readers by July 17.

This is a big one for us. It's our first time asking for an outpouring of support since screams of FAKE NEWS and so much of what Trump stood for made everything we do so visceral. Like most newsrooms, we face incredibly hard budget realities, and it's unnerving needing to raise big money when traffic is down.

So, as we ask you to consider supporting our team's journalism, we thought we'd slow down and check in about where Mother Jones is and where we're going after the chaotic last several years. This comparatively slow moment is also an urgent one for Mother Jones: You can read more in "Slow News Is Good News," and if you're able to, please support our team's hard-hitting journalism and help us reach our big $350,000 goal with a donation today.

payment methods

IT'S NOT THAT WE'RE SCREWED WITHOUT TRUMP:

"It's that we're screwed with or without him if we can't show the public that what we do matters for the long term," writes Mother Jones CEO Monika Bauerlein as she kicks off our drive to raise $350,000 in donations from readers by July 17.

This is a big one for us. So, as we ask you to consider supporting our team's journalism, we thought we'd slow down and check in about where Mother Jones is and where we're going after the chaotic last several years. This comparatively slow moment is also an urgent one for Mother Jones: You can read more in "Slow News Is Good News," and if you're able to, please support our team's hard-hitting journalism and help us reach our big $350,000 goal with a donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate