Right-Wing Pundit: Petraeus Is a Slave to Shariah

Photo illustration/Petraeus: <a href="http://washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/2011/04/report-white-house-considering-gen-petraeus-next-cia-director">Washington Examiner</a>; Dome of the Rock: <a href="http://i.images.cdn.fotopedia.com/flickr-3213526464-original/World_Heritage_Sites/Middle_East/Jerusalem_Site_proposed_by_Jordan/Old_City_of_Jerusalem_and_its_Walls/Dome_of_the_Rock/Dome_of_the_Rock-Islam-original.jpg">Fotopedia</a>


There are plenty of reasons to be skeptical of Gen. David Petraeus’ upcoming job move from Kabul to the CIA: his cult of personality; his overselling of progress in Afghanistan; his escalation of the air war and violent conventional tactics; the idea that intelligence policy might become more militarized, and the military might become spookier. But here’s a novel criticism of the golden general from right-wing Islamophobe Frank Gaffney, he of the “ground zero mosque” freakout, the military logo freakout, and the Islamic law freakout: He’s a mind slave to Shariah law! ThinkProgress reports on Gaffney’s response in a recent Q&A at Liberty University:

Let me just mention several different ways in which this kind of influence operation is being run against those sorts of target sets…I’m sure most of you witnessed General David Petraeus, the much admired military leader, responding to the Quran burning down in Florida by Pastor Terry Jones. Saying that the holy Quran – repeatedly – the holy Quran must not be desecrated, and in other ways, suggesting that what we are doing here is a kind of submission to this program, lest we give offense, which is a blasphemy and a capital crime under Sharia.

Man, is that a high bar for true-blue Americanness. Petraeus must be asking himself: How many Afghan villages does a guy have to flatten to prove he’s no fan of Islamic jurisprudence?

THE BIG QUESTION...

as we head into 2020 is whether politics and media will be a billionaires’ game, or a playing field where the rest of us have a shot. That's what Mother Jones CEO Monika Bauerlein tackles in her annual December column—"Billionaires Are Not the Answer"—about the state of journalism and our plans for the year ahead.

We can't afford to let independent reporting depend on the goodwill of the superrich: Please help Mother Jones build an alternative to oligarchy that is funded by and answerable to its readers. Please join us with a tax-deductible, year-end donation so we can keep going after the big stories without fear, favor, or false equivalency.

THE BIG QUESTION...

as we head into 2020 is whether politics and media will be a billionaires’ game, or a playing field where the rest of us have a shot.

Please read our annual column about the state of journalism and Mother Jones' plans for the year ahead, and help us build an alternative to oligarchy by supporting our people-powered journalism with a year-end gift today.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.