The Lobbyist File: Doug Johnson

The low-profile operator behind the GOP’s reenergized anti-abortion push.

Kristina Hernandez/Flickr/Getty

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis and more, subscribe to Mother Jones' newsletters.


A.K.A.: “The most effective lobbyist in Washington” —National Review

“The indispensible man behind all of the greatest pro-life victories in Congress since Roe v. Wade” —Life Prizes


POSITION: Chief lobbyist for National Right to Life Committee, the nation’s preeminent anti-abortion group. He’s been there since 1981. Most recently the unseen force behind the House GOP’s push to orchestrate the most audacious legislative assault on abortion rights in recent memory.


DISTINGUISHING FEATURES: Wears thick glasses and off-the-rack suits. Lacks the brusque manner and speedy walk of most K Street types. Unflappable, doesn’t schmooze politicians, speaks slowly enough for reporters to keep up. The rare lobbyist who’s actually a fervent believer in his cause.


KNOWN ASSOCIATES: Richard Doerflinger, top lobbyist on pro-life issues for the US Conference of Catholic Bishops; Rep. Chris Smith (R-N.J.), sponsor of HR 3 (see below).


KNOWN ENEMIES: The obvious ones: NARAL Pro-Choice America, Planned Parenthood, other pro-choice groups. Johnson receives hate mail and threats from people who think he’s too pro-life—but also from those who think he doesn’t fight hard enough.


M.O.: Working methodically and relentlessly to roll back abortion rights. But he’s not afraid to compromise: In 1993, abortion-rights supporters tried to repeal the Hyde Amendment (PDF), which bans Medicaid funding for abortion. Then-Rep. Henry Hyde (R-Ill.) and Johnson’s group engineered a deal that saved the ban, but added exemptions for rape and incest.


LATEST ACHIEVEMENTS: Johnson helped craft HR 3, the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act, one of the GOP’s top legislative priorities this year. The bill, sponsored by Rep. Smith, is a hodgepodge of anti-abortion provisions, such as forbidding small businesses that receive tax credits for health insurance from buying plans that cover abortions; preventing soldiers and their spouses stationed in countries where abortion is illegal (like Afghanistan) from obtaining the procedure on US bases; and potentially blocking the use of Medicaid dollars to fund abortions for victims of statutory rape. The original draft confined federal abortion funds to cases of “forcible rape.”

HR 3 passed the House in May but will have trouble in the Senate, where pro-choice lawmakers have enough votes to filibuster it. President Obama, whom Johnson believes “wants to advance and expand abortion as much as possible,” has promised a veto (PDF) if the bill crosses his desk. Johnson and his allies’ Plan B is to attach HR 3 or its provisions to must-pass legislation, like the budget.

HR 3 is already having an impact. In 2009, Obama and the Democrats killed a ban on using local funds to subsidize abortions in the District of Columbia. But in April, in response to House demands, they agreed to reinstate the DC abortion ban in exchange for GOP votes on a budget deal. “John, I will give you DC abortion,” Obama reportedly told House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio). “I am not happy about it.”


WHAT HIS OPPONENTS SAY: “In health policy, you tend to think of people who are minor presences on an issue and major presences on an issue,” says George Washington University Law School’s Sara Rosenbaum, who has been called by Democrats to rebut testimony from Johnson. “Doug Johnson is a very major presence on the abortion issue.”


IN HIS OWN WORDS: “A lot of things require more than one Congress to achieve. We don’t sit down and say, ‘If the odds are against it getting all the way through the process in this Congress, it’s not a worthwhile endeavor.’ It is a worthwhile endeavor if it raises an important public policy issue, and we can make progress toward ultimately making it federal public policy.”

Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.