The Finely Tuned Soul of Fitz and The Tantrums

<a href="http://flickr.com/link-to-source-image">Fitz and the Tantrums</a>/Danger Bird Records

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Nestled between the folk stylings of Justin Townes Earle and the bluegrass twang of the legendary Ralph Stanley at San Francisco’s Hardly Strictly Bluegrass Festival last month, soulsters Fitz and the Tantrums took to the Tower of Gold stage to transform the crowd into a hot, sweaty dance party.

Hailing from Los Angeles, the six-piece soul-pop band lays the Motown swagger on thick. But “we didn’t want to make our album Pickin’ Up the Pieces pastiche or revival, though some are quick to label us as that,” says singer Michael Fitzpatrick. “There are a lot of different influences pouring out, hip-hop, new wave, ABC, Talking Heads, and even with the Motown and Stax influences, it’s truly a hybrid of our music tastes and sensibilities.” 

The fact that I can’t stop humming Average White Band’s “Pick Up the Pieces” while writing about them goes to show that good funk is all about the feel. “We’re high energy,” Fitz explains. “That’s where the tantrum comes in. We wanted it to sound like somebody just ratcheted the sound up to 11 and we’re careening off the tracks.” 

Though they may want you to believe that, there’s nothing out of control or half-assed about it. Each studio track is a carefully crafted showcase of powerhouse vocals, twirled flutes, bombastic horns, and on-point percussion with plenty of snare filler for claps, howls, and vocal runs. The band is James Brown tight, minus the fines, and all are seasoned pros and sought-after studio musicians who have worked with the likes of Maroon 5, Madlib, Quantic, Dilated Peoples, Cee Lo, and Iggy Pop.

Pickin’ up the Pieces, their debut, gives the golden oldies of LA’s classic K-Earth 101 a swift kick in the pants. The album is full of car-radio singles like “Money Grabber,” the sing-along “Don’t Gotta Work It Out,” and “Pickin’ Up the Pieces of Love,” which will automatically get you head-bobbing and finger-snapping. “I grew up with a classical music and opera fascist for a father,” Fitzpatrick explains. “But I did have my car and then I could turn on the oldies station there. I instantly gravitated towards those songs—the melody, the backup harmonies you could sing along to it and become a part of the band.”

“Our intent from the very beginning has been to make the audience the seventh member of the show.”

He adds that this kind of dynamism, born from catchy verses and crystal clear composition, brings the audience closer to the band: “Our intent from the very beginning has been to make the audience the seventh member of the show,” Fitzpatrick says. “It just becomes this symbiotic relationship with the crowd.” Look no further than the big wave of standing patrons at Hardly Strictly when “Money Grabber” comes on live. 

The album also features the one-two punch of Fitzpatrick’s and fellow singer Noelle Scaggs’ back-and-forth repoire. Swapping tales of love lost and philandering partners, the two have an electrifying stage presence that Fitz describes as a “will they or won’t they” relationship. “It’s a lot of ‘I love you, I hate you.’ You don’t know if we’re going to make out or fight, and it could go either way at the moment. Obviously the songs are about heartbreak and they just lend themselves to this male-female dynamic.”  

But when I bring up Occupy Wall Street, the singer has a musical take: “‘Money Grabber’ was written as a bitter experience of being with somebody and finding they have ulterior motives,” he says. “But as soon as the song spread, it took on its own meaning in the post-Bernie Maddoff world. And with “Dear Mr. President,” I was trying to come up with that last magic track, and this was right when the economic crisis was happening, when the whole thing crashed. I watched my dad lose half of his retirement in one day—it’s a very real thing for everyone. We decided to write a love letter to our president, to say, ‘Do better.'” 

When I ask Fitzpatrick if the band would consider playing an impromptu show the New York occupation, he says he’d definitely be down, although “I think we’d get shut down in about 3.2 seconds.” 

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate