Charting the Cozy Connections Between JPMorgan and the Senate Banking Committee

A rundown of the long list of connections between JPMorgan Chase and the Senate Banking Committee leading the financial firm’s hearing.

Jamie Dimon, CEO of JP Morgan Chase, testifies before the US Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee.Zhang Jun /Xinhua/Zuma

This story first appeared on the ProPublica website.

This morning, Jamie Dimon, the CEO of JPMorgan Chase, faced a Senate hearing over more than $2 billion in bank losses caused by risky hedges that blew up. Dimon said that the hedges—investments meant to protect the bank—had grown into “complex and hard-to manage risks.” The losses “let a lot of people down, and we are sorry for it.”

Many lawmakers are holding up the losses as evidence of the need for stronger financial regulation. The chairman of the Senate banking committee, Tim Johnson, (D-S.D.) in his opening remarks, asked for “a full accounting” of JPMorgan’s losses.

But through campaign contributions and well-connected staff, JPMorgan appears to have already taken its own accounting of the Banking committee. Here’s a picture of connections between the company and the committee:

Revolving Door

One current staffer on the Senate banking committee, Dwight Fettig, is a former lobbyist for JPMorgan. In 2009, the bank hired him to work on “financial services regulatory reform.” Meanwhile, JPMorgan is stacked thick with former committee staff.

American Banker also reported that three other outside lobbyists currently working for JPMorgan were once affiliated with the committee:

  • Jason Rosenberg: A lobbyist at the Glover Park Group and formerly an aide to Jon Tester (D-Mont.) who sits on the committee.
  • Jenn Fogel-Bublick: A lobbyist at McBee Strategic Consulting and formerly a Democratic counsel on the committee.
  • Mike Chappell: A lobbyist for Fierce, Isakowitz & Blalock and a former press assistant to Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), another committee member.

A former senator on the committee, Mel Martinez (R-Fla.), is also now the JPMorgan exec in charge of Florida, Central America, and the Caribbean. Martinez was elected to the Senate in 2004 and went to the bank in 2010. Bloomberg reported that he was called to Washington after the losses were reported.

Lobbyists for JPMorgan appear to be keeping busy. The bank spent $7.6 million on lobbying last year, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

Campaign Contributions:

JPMorgan has also been a generous donor to banking committee members, both Republican and Democratic.

  • JPMorgan is the second-largest campaign contributor to Johnson, the committee chair, and to the top Republican on the committee, Richard Shelby of Alabama, over the past 20 years, according to a tally from American Banker.
  • JPMorgan employees have donated more than $80,000 to Johnson since 1998 and more than $136,000 to Shelby since 1990.
  • So far in 2012, Dimon has personally donated to committee members Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) and Mark Warner (D-Va.). In 2008, he gave $2,000 each to Johnson and Shelby.
  • Six of the 22 members of the banking committee have not received any money from JPMorgan PACs or employees in recent election cycles. Two of those members are retiring and aren’t collecting campaign funds.

It’s not clear what the committee will do beyond the hearings. Numerous federal agencies are investigating JPMorgan’s losses, including the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Department of Justice, and the Securities and Exchange Commission. Next Tuesday, Dimon will testify in front of the House Committee on Financial Services.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.