Obama Announces Another Delay in Ending the War in Afghanistan

Nearly 10,000 soldiers will stay until the end of next year.

Massoud Hossaini/AP

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.


Next year was supposed to be the year American soldiers finally came home for good from the war in Afghanistan, the longest conflict in the history of the United States. Now the end of that war is being delayed yet again.

President Barack Obama announced on Thursday that the United States would keep its current force of 9,800 soldiers in Afghanistan through most of next year. Under a plan announced in March, troop numbers were supposed to drop to 5,500 by the end of 2015, but that reduction now won’t take place until early 2017.

American soldiers stopped taking part in major combat in 2014 but have remained in the country for what Obama called “two narrow but critical missions: training Afghan forces and supporting a counterterrorism mission against the remnants of al-Qaeda.” While Obama praised the progress of Afghan soldiers so far this year, he acknowledged that “Afghan forces are still not as strong as they need to be.”

The United States has poured billions of dollars and more than a decade into training those Afghan soldiers and police officers, who were supposed to replace Americans in the fight against the Taliban. But those forces have repeatedly fallen short. Just last month, Taliban fighters took over the city of Kunduz in northern Afghanistan and held it for two weeks. It was the first time since the US-led invasion that a provincial capital was lost, and the insurgents reportedly faced only token resistance from Afghan security forces. Major attacks have also continued to hit the capital of Kabul, including the suicide bombing of a British military convoy on Sunday.

Obama acknowledged the loss of Kunduz during his speech, and the fact that Afghans required American support to reclaim the city. The country’s armed forces still lack vital functions like intelligence, logistics, and air cover that would allow them to operate independently of the United States. “In key areas of the country, the security situation is very fragile, and in some places there’s risk of deterioration,” Obama said.

Obama cast Thursday’s announcement as a routine adjustment of war plans rather than a major change. “This decision’s not disappointing,” he said in response to a reporter’s question. “This is consistent with the overall vision that we’ve had. And frankly, we anticipated as we were drawing troops that there were times that we would have to slow things down or fill in gaps.”

He also nodded to the frustrations of the American public over the length of the war. “I know many of you have grown weary of this conflict,” he said, but insisted that the drawdown delay offered “the best possibility for lasting progress in Afghanistan.”

IT'S NOT THAT WE'RE SCREWED WITHOUT TRUMP:

"It's that we're screwed with or without him if we can't show the public that what we do matters for the long term," writes Mother Jones CEO Monika Bauerlein as she kicks off our drive to raise $350,000 in donations from readers by July 17.

This is a big one for us. It's our first time asking for an outpouring of support since screams of FAKE NEWS and so much of what Trump stood for made everything we do so visceral. Like most newsrooms, we face incredibly hard budget realities, and it's unnerving needing to raise big money when traffic is down.

So, as we ask you to consider supporting our team's journalism, we thought we'd slow down and check in about where Mother Jones is and where we're going after the chaotic last several years. This comparatively slow moment is also an urgent one for Mother Jones: You can read more in "Slow News Is Good News," and if you're able to, please support our team's hard-hitting journalism and help us reach our big $350,000 goal with a donation today.

payment methods

IT'S NOT THAT WE'RE SCREWED WITHOUT TRUMP:

"It's that we're screwed with or without him if we can't show the public that what we do matters for the long term," writes Mother Jones CEO Monika Bauerlein as she kicks off our drive to raise $350,000 in donations from readers by July 17.

This is a big one for us. So, as we ask you to consider supporting our team's journalism, we thought we'd slow down and check in about where Mother Jones is and where we're going after the chaotic last several years. This comparatively slow moment is also an urgent one for Mother Jones: You can read more in "Slow News Is Good News," and if you're able to, please support our team's hard-hitting journalism and help us reach our big $350,000 goal with a donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate