Donald Trump Talks About San Bernardino Shooter (Corrected)

Mic Smith/AP

Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.


CORRECTION: Others have pointed out that in this quote, Donald Trump said, “The wife probably radicalized him.” Given that this comment occurred during cross-talk, while he was on the phone, this seems to be a more accurate description of what he said. We apologize for the error.

A bizarre exchange occurred on MSNBC’s Morning Joe on Tuesday. Donald Trump was doing a phoner. Naturally, the big subject of the day was his unconstitutional, unworkable, and outrageous proposal to ban Muslims—including American Muslims traveling abroad—from entering the United States. And Trump was defending his idea (and praising Franklin D. Roosevelt’s internment of Japanese Americans). At one point, Trump said he hoped his ban “doesn’t take long,” but then he went on about the report that a deposit of $28,500 was made into the account of Syed Farook, the husband in the couple who mounted the San Bernardino attack last week. He said:

How many other checks were sent to people all over the country that had been radicalized? Nobody knew this guy was radicalized. I probably radicalized him.

I probably radicalized him? So was Trump suggesting that his own harsh anti-Muslim rhetoric had radicalized Farook? If so, that would seem to be an admission that his approach is counterproductive and dangerous. Yet Trump does not admit mistakes, right? If he did, that would be huge.

Journalist Mark Halperin, who was questioning Trump at the time, did not follow up regarding this comment. The Onion, though, foresaw this campaign moment with an article it published yesterday. The headline: “Trump Gives Muslim On Fence About Radicalizing Just The Push He Needed.”

You can watch Trump’s remark here:

The full interview is here.

Owned by no one—except you.

We just keep seeing it happen: Newsrooms owned by billionaires and corporations are spinning their own narratives, overwriting the truth, following only stories that keep them in the pocket of those with even more power.

Not here. We’re not owned by anyone. We’re not part of any cult that demands our allegiance to a bottom line. We’ve spoken up and spoken out while other newsrooms changed their stories—or cut them altogether—to keep the C suite happy.

Our mission is to find the truth and amplify it. That’s why we’re independent, nonprofit, and, crucially, funded by readers. The investigations on our website will always be free to read, watch, and listen to, but our newsroom is powered by readers who pitch in what they can so we can keep asking the hard questions.

Can you chip in today?

Owned by no one—except you.

We just keep seeing it happen: Newsrooms owned by billionaires and corporations are spinning their own narratives, overwriting the truth, following only stories that keep them in the pocket of those with even more power.

Not here. We’re not owned by anyone. We’re not part of any cult that demands our allegiance to a bottom line. We’ve spoken up and spoken out while other newsrooms changed their stories—or cut them altogether—to keep the C suite happy.

Our mission is to find the truth and amplify it. That’s why we’re independent, nonprofit, and, crucially, funded by readers. The investigations on our website will always be free to read, watch, and listen to, but our newsroom is powered by readers who pitch in what they can so we can keep asking the hard questions.

Can you chip in today?

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

INDEPENDENT. BECAUSE OF YOU.

Mother Jones has no billionaires calling the shots—just readers like you making fearless reporting possible

Donate