Remember When Ivanka Trump Defended Her Dad’s View of Women on Dr. Oz?

A month before the groping tape, she called talk of his misogyny a “false narrative.”

Evan Vucci/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


In the hours after the Washington Post released a video of Donald Trump bragging about groping women and condoning sexual assault, Ivanka Trump, who has served as the campaign’s main prime surrogate for attracting women voters, has said nothing publicly. But a month ago, Trump’s oldest daughter tried to shut down questions about her father’s treatment of women. In a much-watched joint appearance on Dr. Mehmet Oz’s television show, Ivanka and her father dismissed the idea that he is a misogynist. The pair blamed the media and Democrats for creating and promoting the idea that Donald Trump does not respect women. Ivanka pooh-poohed criticism of her father’s attitudes toward women as a “false narrative.”

During the show, Trump declared, “I have such respect for women.” He went on: “My mother was one of the great people I’ve of known in my life. I just think that somehow I have a narrative out there —you know, when you have hundreds of millions of dollars spent on you in advertising, okay, on advertising, on false advertising in many cases, but negative hit jobs, you know, I guess maybe—”

Dr. Oz cut him off. “You have said unkind things about women. Do you regret those?” Trump demurred. He referenced his many appearances on Howard Stern’s radio show in the 1990s and 2000s, when the two made oafish and lewd comments about women, noting that they we “have fun” and that he wouldn’t have said those things as a politician. It was, he suggested, just boys being boys.

Then Ivanka Trump jumped in:

I do think there is a bit of a false narrative on this out there, though, in that my father speaks his mind. So whether it’s a man or a woman, if you attack him he’ll attack you back. In a certain way, it would be strange if he handled women and men differently. So he can be a little rough with people once in a while, but it is often that they’re coming at you first, almost always that they’re coming at you first.

In other words: Trump is fine with women and treats tas he does men.

This wasn’t the first time that Ivanka Trump felt compelled to defend her father on this front. In May, during an interview with CBS’ Norah O’Donnell, she insisted that her father was “not a groper.” Oops.

Trump released a statement on Friday afternoon saying, “I apologize if anyone was offended.” When it became clear that many people—including Republicans—considered that a tepid response, he released a video statement around midnight in which he briefly apologized, attacked Bill Clinton, and called the video a “distraction from the important issues we’re facing today.” As of Saturday afternoon, there was still no word from Ivanka Trump and no indication whether she still believes that all the nasty stories about her father are just a “false narrative.”

Here’s the full transcript of that exchange with Dr. Oz:

Oz: And there is a misconception—that I think you would argue anyway—about the views that you have on women. And this comes up a lot. Why do you think there is such a discussion going on now about that problem?

Donald Trump: I don’t know. You know, it’s very interesting. Because I just think, look, I have such respect for women. My mother was one of the great people I’ve of known in my life. I just think that somehow I have a narrative out there — you know, when you have hundreds of millions of dollars spent on you in advertising, okay, on advertising, on false advertising in many cases, but negative hit jobs, you know, I guess maybe—

Oz: You have said unkind things about women. Do you regret those?

Donald Trump: It depends what you’re talking about. I’ll give you an example: When I’m having fun, when I was never going to be a politician. I decided a year and a half ago, let’s do it to straighten out country, because the country is a mess. But before that had I known I was going to be a politician—Howard Stern is a friend of mine—I wouldn’t have done his show. We have fun. We have fun. A lot of people understand that. We have fun. So we’ll talk about women. We’ll talk about men. We’ll talk about everything, and we’re all having a good time. Now if I ever as running for president, I wouldn’t have done the show, or I would have given him very boring answers. We’re all having fun together.

Ivanka Trump: I do think there is a bit of a false narrative on this out there, though, in that my father speaks his mind. So whether it’s a man or a woman, if you attack him he’ll attack you back. In a certain way, it would be strange if he handled women and men differently. so he can be a little rough with people once in a while, but it is often that they’re coming at you first, almost always that they’re coming at you first.

Trump: I like to be nice to people, but sometimes people aren’t nice to me.

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate