Who’s the Russian Ambassador at the Center of Two Trump Administration Scandals?

Sergey Kislyak’s name keeps coming up.

Cliff Owen/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Wait, where have I heard the name Sergey Kislyak before?

Sergey Kislyak is Russia’s ambassador to the United States, who has served as a key link between his country and Donald Trump’s camp. Conversations with Kislyak have ensnared two Trump appointees—former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn and Attorney General Jeff Sessions—in scandal. Flynn resigned after it came to light he lied about having discussed US sanctions against Russia with the ambassador before Trump took office. Their conversations took place as the Obama administration decided to impose new sanctions as a result of the country’s interference in the 2016 elections. Now Sessions, too, is caught up with Kislyak. At his confirmation hearing, Session claimed he “did not have communications with the Russians” during Trump’s campaign, but on Thursday, the Washington Post reported that he actually met with Kislyak twice. Democrats called for the attorney general to resign, and several congressional republicans said he should recuse himself from any investigation into improper contact between Russia and the Trump campaign. Sessions called a press conference late on Thursday to announce he would step back from any relevant investigations.

So who is Kislyak anyway?

For the last nine years, Kislyak has served as Russia’s ambassador to the United States, an unusually long stint, according to CNN. Before becoming an ambassador, he served as Russia’s deputy minister of foreign affairs, where he helped negotiate international arms control agreements. Kislyak  reportedly first joined the Soviet Foreign Ministry in 1977 after graduating from the Moscow Engineering Physics Institute.

I heard something about Kislyak being a Russian spy. Is that true?

Maybe? According to CNN, Kislyak has been described by current and former US intelligence officials as a top spy and spy recruiter. A Russian government spokesperson dismissed the allegations, describing them as “depersonalized assumptions of the media that are constantly trying to blow this situation out of proportion.”

What does Kislyak think about the United States?

Back in October, Kislyak told the Detroit Economic Club that Russia had “become collateral damage in the fight between the two parties here.” The next month he said the two countries were “living through the worst time in our relationship,” a curious claim considering mutually assured destruction doesn’t seem to be on the table. Here’s an interesting tidbit from a State Department cable released by WikiLeaks: After meetings with a handful of Russian officials in 2007, including Kislyak, an Israeli official came away with the view that “Russia hates the U.S., wants to become an empire again, and feels empowered because of its oil.” The Israeli reported that the Russians he met with “see cooperation with the U.S. as endangering their own strategic interests.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT.

We have a considerable $390,000 gap in our online fundraising budget that we have to close by June 30. There is no wiggle room, we've already cut everything we can, and we urgently need more readers to pitch in—especially from this specific blurb you're reading right now.

We'll also be quite transparent and level-headed with you about this.

In "News Never Pays," our fearless CEO, Monika Bauerlein, connects the dots on several concerning media trends that, taken together, expose the fallacy behind the tragic state of journalism right now: That the marketplace will take care of providing the free and independent press citizens in a democracy need, and the Next New Thing to invest millions in will fix the problem. Bottom line: Journalism that serves the people needs the support of the people. That's the Next New Thing.

And it's what MoJo and our community of readers have been doing for 47 years now.

But staying afloat is harder than ever.

In "This Is Not a Crisis. It's The New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, why this moment is particularly urgent, and how we can best communicate that without screaming OMG PLEASE HELP over and over. We also touch on our history and how our nonprofit model makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there: Letting us go deep, focus on underreported beats, and bring unique perspectives to the day's news.

You're here for reporting like that, not fundraising, but one cannot exist without the other, and it's vitally important that we hit our intimidating $390,000 number in online donations by June 30.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. It's going to be a nail-biter, and we really need to see donations from this specific ask coming in strong if we're going to get there.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT.

We have a considerable $390,000 gap in our online fundraising budget that we have to close by June 30. There is no wiggle room, we've already cut everything we can, and we urgently need more readers to pitch in—especially from this specific blurb you're reading right now.

We'll also be quite transparent and level-headed with you about this.

In "News Never Pays," our fearless CEO, Monika Bauerlein, connects the dots on several concerning media trends that, taken together, expose the fallacy behind the tragic state of journalism right now: That the marketplace will take care of providing the free and independent press citizens in a democracy need, and the Next New Thing to invest millions in will fix the problem. Bottom line: Journalism that serves the people needs the support of the people. That's the Next New Thing.

And it's what MoJo and our community of readers have been doing for 47 years now.

But staying afloat is harder than ever.

In "This Is Not a Crisis. It's The New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, why this moment is particularly urgent, and how we can best communicate that without screaming OMG PLEASE HELP over and over. We also touch on our history and how our nonprofit model makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there: Letting us go deep, focus on underreported beats, and bring unique perspectives to the day's news.

You're here for reporting like that, not fundraising, but one cannot exist without the other, and it's vitally important that we hit our intimidating $390,000 number in online donations by June 30.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. It's going to be a nail-biter, and we really need to see donations from this specific ask coming in strong if we're going to get there.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate