Trump Set a Record-Low Refugee Cap. Now He May Cut It in Half.

The United States’ annual refugee cap was 110,000 under Barack Obama. It could drop to 25,000.

Syrian refugees wait to register at an employment office at a refugee camp in Jordan.Raad Adayleh/AP

Last year, President Donald Trump cut the annual cap on the number of refugees allowed into the United States to the lowest level on record. This year’s 45,000-person limit is less than half the 111,00o-person cap set by Barack Obama in 2016. Now the Trump administration is considering nearly halving the refugee limit again.

The New York Times reports that the Trump administration may set a 25,000-person limit for the 2019 fiscal year. The push to slash refugee admissions is meeting less internal resistance than it did last year. The Times attributes the shift to White House policy adviser Stephen Miller’s success in installing anti-immigration hardliners in key positions throughout the administration.

In reality, the number of refugees admitted may be even lower, due to increasingly strict vetting requirements that make it hard for refugees to enter the country. The administration is on pace to admit fewer than half of the 45,000 refugees allowed under the 2018 cap.

The Daily Beast reported last month that the Trump administration was looking to set the 2019 refugee cap between 20,000 and 25,000 people. Barbara Strack, a former DHS official who helped oversee refugee admissions until January, told the Daily Beast, “We’ve completely abandoned leadership [on refugees] and a commitment to their protection at a time when world needs couldn’t be higher.”

The Nationalities Service Center, a Philadelphia-based organization that helps resettle refugees, has seen a steep drop in resettlement since Trump took office. Data provided by Margaret O’Sullivan, the group’s executive director, show that the NSC resettled 373 refugees in the last seven months of 2016. That dropped to 62 in the last seven months of 2017 and 52 in the first seven months of 2018.

When asked how further reducing the cap would affect refugees and their advocates, O’Sullivan said, “We know what that feel likes because that’s where we are now.”


The more we thought about how MoJo's journalism can have the most impact heading into the 2020 election, the more we realized that so many of today's stories come down to corruption: democracy and the rule of law being undermined by the wealthy and powerful for their own gain.

So we're launching a new Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption. We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We'll publish what we find as a major series in the summer of 2020, including a special issue of our magazine, a dedicated online portal, and video and podcast series so it doesn't get lost in the daily deluge of breaking news.

It's unlike anything we've done before and we've got seed funding to get started, but we're asking readers to help crowdfund this new beat with an additional $500,000 so we can go even bigger. You can read why we're taking this approach and what we want to accomplish in "Corruption Isn't Just Another Scandal. It's the Rot Beneath All of Them," and if you like how it sounds, please help fund it with a tax-deductible donation today.

We Recommend


Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.


Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.