Elizabeth Warren Calls for Impeachment Proceedings Against Trump

“Donald Trump obstructed the investigation.”

Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) speaks during an campaign rally in Salt Lake City, Utah, on April 17, 2019.Rick Bowmer/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Elizabeth Warren said Friday afternoon that the House of Representatives should “initiate impeachment proceedings” against President Trump. Warren’s comments—the strongest yet from a major Democratic presidential candidate—come one day after the release of a redacted version of special counsel Robert Mueller’s report on his investigation into contacts between the Trump campaign and Russia.

The Massachusetts senator and former law professor laid out her thinking in a four-part Twitter thread Friday afternoon. She explained that the Mueller report offers proof that Russia interfered in the 2016 elections and that Donald Trump “welcomed that help.” After his election, Warren added, Trump “obstructed the investigation into that attack.”

Citing a section of the report that highlights Congress’s power to “prohibit” a president’s “corrupt use of his authority,” Warren argued that the proper vehicle for exercising that power is impeachment.

Warren concluded that the evidence should compel federal lawmakers to “set aside political considerations and do their constitutional duty.” In other words: “That means the House should initiate impeachment proceedings against the President of the United States.”

While most of the Democratic presidential contenders have pointed to Mueller’s findings as evidence of Trump’s corruption, Warren’s comments go considerably further. The Massachusetts senator has made fighting political corruption a cornerstone of her career. Late last year, she introduced sweeping legislation that would, among other measures, ban foreign lobbying and establish a new independent agency dedicated to enforcing federal ethics and anti-corrupution laws in the executive branch. Some of those ideas found their way into the “For the People Act,” the Democratic political reform bill that passed the House earlier this year.

Other Democratic White House hopefuls have been more circumspect when discussing impeachment. During his 2018 Senate bid against Ted Cruz, Beto O’Rourke—who at the time was a congressman from Texas—said he would vote to move forward with impeachment hearings against Trump. Since entering the presidential fray, O’Rourke has said the matter is for Congress to decide, but he maintained his position that Trump committed “impeachable offenses.” O’Rourke told CBS last month that the 2020 election might be a better way to remove Trump from office. “I think the American people are going to have a chance to decide this at the ballot box in November 2020,” he said, “and perhaps that’s the best way for us to resolve these outstanding questions.”

Washington Gov. Jay Inslee, another Democratic presidential candidate, said Friday that impeachment “should not be off the table.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT.

We have a considerable $390,000 gap in our online fundraising budget that we have to close by June 30. There is no wiggle room, we've already cut everything we can, and we urgently need more readers to pitch in—especially from this specific blurb you're reading right now.

We'll also be quite transparent and level-headed with you about this.

In "News Never Pays," our fearless CEO, Monika Bauerlein, connects the dots on several concerning media trends that, taken together, expose the fallacy behind the tragic state of journalism right now: That the marketplace will take care of providing the free and independent press citizens in a democracy need, and the Next New Thing to invest millions in will fix the problem. Bottom line: Journalism that serves the people needs the support of the people. That's the Next New Thing.

And it's what MoJo and our community of readers have been doing for 47 years now.

But staying afloat is harder than ever.

In "This Is Not a Crisis. It's The New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, why this moment is particularly urgent, and how we can best communicate that without screaming OMG PLEASE HELP over and over. We also touch on our history and how our nonprofit model makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there: Letting us go deep, focus on underreported beats, and bring unique perspectives to the day's news.

You're here for reporting like that, not fundraising, but one cannot exist without the other, and it's vitally important that we hit our intimidating $390,000 number in online donations by June 30.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. It's going to be a nail-biter, and we really need to see donations from this specific ask coming in strong if we're going to get there.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT.

We have a considerable $390,000 gap in our online fundraising budget that we have to close by June 30. There is no wiggle room, we've already cut everything we can, and we urgently need more readers to pitch in—especially from this specific blurb you're reading right now.

We'll also be quite transparent and level-headed with you about this.

In "News Never Pays," our fearless CEO, Monika Bauerlein, connects the dots on several concerning media trends that, taken together, expose the fallacy behind the tragic state of journalism right now: That the marketplace will take care of providing the free and independent press citizens in a democracy need, and the Next New Thing to invest millions in will fix the problem. Bottom line: Journalism that serves the people needs the support of the people. That's the Next New Thing.

And it's what MoJo and our community of readers have been doing for 47 years now.

But staying afloat is harder than ever.

In "This Is Not a Crisis. It's The New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, why this moment is particularly urgent, and how we can best communicate that without screaming OMG PLEASE HELP over and over. We also touch on our history and how our nonprofit model makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there: Letting us go deep, focus on underreported beats, and bring unique perspectives to the day's news.

You're here for reporting like that, not fundraising, but one cannot exist without the other, and it's vitally important that we hit our intimidating $390,000 number in online donations by June 30.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. It's going to be a nail-biter, and we really need to see donations from this specific ask coming in strong if we're going to get there.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate