Ginni Thomas Admits She Attended January 6 Stop the Steal Rally

She says she left before Trump supporters stormed the Capitol.

Clarence and Virginia Thomas arrive for the State Dinner hosted by United States President Donald J. Trump and First lady Melania TrumRon Sachs/CNP/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Ginni Thomas, the wife of Supreme Court justice Clarence Thomas, admitted for the first time that she attended the notorious Stop the Steal rally on January 6, 2020, which culminated in the attack on the US Capitol. The startling disclosure came during an interview with the Washington Free Beacon, a conservative website, and raises further questions about whether her political activism and ties to the far right constitute a conflict of interest for her husband. 

In an otherwise sympathetic portrait of Ginni Thomas that sought to push back on mounting concerns that her behavior might violate ethical norms, the Free Beacon revealed that the longtime conservative activist had attended the rally on the Ellipse for a short period of time but returned home because she felt “cold,” before Trump supporters stormed the Capitol. That day, Thomas posted on Facebook in support of the rally, only to later walk back her comments, noting that she had written the posts “before violence.” 

Thomas’s hyper-partisan remarks and conservative activism have long raised eyebrows, but recent reporting from the New Yorker and the New York Times has reinvigorated discussions about whether her ties to the fringes of the right pose a problem for the Supreme Court. 

In her interview with the Free Beacon, Thomas attempted to dispel such concerns by claiming that she and her husband occupy separate “lanes.”

“The legal lane is my husband’s—I never much enjoyed reading briefs and judicial opinions anyway and am quite happy to stay out of that lane,” she said.

Thomas has never been a named party to a Supreme Court case; however, she has held positions of leadership in conservative groups involved in such cases and has, in her own capacity, taken significant action to target policies that her husband has voted to curtail or overturn, such as the Affordable Care Act, Roe v. Wade, and affirmative action. 

Of particular note is her involvement in the group Groundswell, a conservative network, which—according to memos first obtained and reported by Mother Jones in 2013sees itself as waging a “30 front war” against progressives and moderate Republicans. Thomas described herself as the “chairman” of Groundswell in 2019 and helped compile an “enemies list” of Republicans who the organization deemed insufficiently loyal to Donald Trump, according to reporting by the New York Times. She also has ties to far-right figures such as Steve Bannon, Sebastian Gorka, and Ali Alexander, and has proclaimed that America is under attack by the “deep state” and the “fascist left,” which includes “transsexual fascists.”

Legal experts have noted that the federal statute governing the recusal of Supreme Court justices is opaque, instructing them to sit out of cases where their impartiality “might reasonably be questioned”. The section of the statute concerning spouses only obliges justices to recuse themselves if their partners are direct parties, likely witnesses, or lawyers to the proceeding or if they possess interests “substantially affected” by it. However, many justices and judges have chosen to recuse themselves from cases to which they have more indirect connections to avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest. In a situation analogous to that of Ginni Thomas, Jane Sullivan Roberts, the wife of Justice John Roberts, retired from her career as a lawyer and resigned from her role leading an anti-abortion group upon her husband’s appointment to the court. 

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate