Do Democrats Hear Themselves?

Nancy Pelosi, Tammy Murphy, and an ever-expanding Axis of Evil.

Christophe Gateau/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On Sunday, Nancy Pelosi suggested on national television that the FBI investigate pro-Palestinian protesters over her suspicion that some are being financed by Russia—a hunch the powerful Democrat presented without evidence. Later, she defended it, again without evidence.

The remarks, with their whiff of Hooverite conflation of protesters with foreign threats, were instantly condemned by the Muslim civil rights group CAIR. But as anti-democratic as Pelosi’s comments were, they were equally instructive of how a subset of influential Democrats see Israel’s destruction of Gaza. Take a look at this quote from another Democrat (albeit a very recent Democrat) from New York‘s terrific profile of Tammy Murphy, the first lady of New Jersey who is running for US Senate:

She also floats a theory about the [Israel-Hamas] war, drawing on the years she lived abroad when Phil [the governor] served as President Obama’s ambassador to Germany: “In my opinion, there’s about four really bad actors in the world”—Iran, Russia, China, and North Korea—”and this whole thing was instigated as a proxy war in order to distract the West, in order to make sure we weren’t able to focus on Ukraine.”

Murphy’s version of this theory, unlike Pelosi’s, does not call for law enforcement to look into ceasefire proponents. But in leaping to an exceptionally unlikely theory of what led Hamas—which has attacked Israel for decades—to attack Israel on October 7, Murphy is at once implausibly conspiratorial and shockingly dismissive of the death toll in a horrific war in which the United States is playing a key role. 

What is the big picture Murphy is proposing? Is it for us to view Israel’s campaign against Gaza—which has killed over 26,000 people—and the US’s support for Gaza’s destruction as being complicit with a grand attempt to “distract the West”? That we zoom out to consider that Hamas has links to Iran, and that Iran has links to Russia, and that one should, therefore think the Biden administration is playing smart geopolitical chess against the world’s “bad actors”? These approaches contain flashes of David Frum’s infamous Axis of Evil, an over-simplistic and reckless worldview that led us into disaster before.

Just as Pelosi invoked her career on the Senate Intelligence Committee in lieu of actual evidence about Russian funding of protesters, Murphy seems to believe that living abroad for several years equates to understanding the nuances of geopolitics in a way that the masses simply cannot.

Yes, how convinced they are in the notion that the masses don’t understand the broader picture. But lazy theories pointing to the usual “bad” suspects are simply not the same as understanding the complexities of a widening regional war. It is hawkishness disguised as faux nuance. If you want the war, say it.

Some Democrats seem to want it both ways, framing discussions of a horrific war mostly as an election issue. Criticism is unhelpful because to these voters, keeping Donald Trump out of the White House is the paramount issue. But unhelpful to whom? Who could look at “hell” in Gaza and not think beyond 2024? 

Shortly after Pelosi’s remarks, some warned that they could end up hurting Joe Biden’s reelection campaign. That might very well be true; many are indeed disgusted with this administration’s handling of the Israel-Hamas war. But instincts to judge Pelosi’s comments through the lens of winning elections misses not seeing them for what they plainly are: a politician saying a protest against war isn’t legitimate—and that the federal government should use law enforcement to intimidate its critics. 

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with The Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with The Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate