- ‹ previous
- 149 of 1494
- next ›
SF Chronicle to Open Typewriter Shop
The above apocryphal headline was more or less my initial reaction to this morning's paper, which was being handed out free downtown to tout the Chron's first issue printed on new, state-of-the-art, very expensive Canadian presses. Above the fold, a big photo of the Golden Gate Bridge poking through the fog at sunset is tailored to demonstrate just how nicely these presses work. "Today's editions usher in a brighter and more visually exciting era" for the paper, says a note announcing the changes, which include the paper's second major redesign this year. (In February, it touted the prior makeover—with its notes of USA Today—as "brighter and more modern.") But back to today's paper. It includes a special four-page section showing how the exciting new presses work. "A new era gets rolling," it promises.
Where, then, are the ads for those cool rotary telephones? Those newfangled horse-and-buggy courier services? Hot new 8-track releases, and the moving pictures?
The Chronicle's woes, and those of our industry, won't be solved by gimmicks. People want crisp photos, but they're not going to drop their iPhones and Kindles and rush to subscribe to a paper just because it now looks up to snuff. Evidence of a deeper problem lies in section F, where the paper has yet another Golden Gate Bridge photo to accompany a five-part series on… fog, penned by a onetime Chronicle health reporter. "Our Fabled Fog," beckons the headline. And the subhead: "It's part of the magic and beauty of San Francisco, permeating all avenues of life—and we should expect even more of it in the future"
I thought the Onion had ceased publishing in San Francisco.
Look, with all respect to the good people at the Chron, many of whom are friends and old colleagues (and also to the Oakland Tribune, and daily newspapers across the land), we all know where this is headed. We read Romenesko, after all.
It's not just the newspapers, of course. Local TV news, still where a good chunk of the populace gets its info, has been a bad joke forever. I recently learned just how bad.
A few weeks ago, my friend Amy Shelf got a call from San Francisco’s KRON 4, a former NBC affiliate, now independent, that bills itself “the Bay Area’s News Station.” The caller, a polite young woman, wanted to set up a meeting with Amy to talk about opportunities for her to appear on the air and speak about legal issues—Amy is a lawyer.
Was the caller a news producer? Not exactly. She wanted Amy to pay $1,000, presumably per month, to star in a five-minute monthly segment. Amy consulted her moral compass. “I was like, ‘I think that’s totally unethical,’" she tells me later, recalling the conversation. "And she said, ‘Well, it looks like the news.’ And I said, ‘That’s exactly what makes it unethical!’”
KRON's sales rep quickly added that the paid segments were identified as such, but Amy still wasn’t buying. Proper disclosure, of course, would make the whole thing just a bit less slimy. So I went online and viewed some of the segments in question. There was plenty to be concerned about.
Take Medical Mondays, KRON’s call-in health-advice show. The 24-minute segment is preceded by a seven-second disclaimer noting that the following program was paid for by Seton Medical Center. If you happened to tune it in after eight seconds, you’d be none the wiser.
As promised by the saleswoman, this and similar programs have the look and feel of a real news-talk show, complete with a news ticker scrolling past underneath and chirons (the graphic tags that identify the person speaking) that are pretty much indistinguishable from those you'd see on regular news segments. Each paid segment is introduced by an anchor situated in what appears to be KRON's newsroom. Medical Mondays is hosted by Vicki Liviakis, one of the station's longtime anchors, who, according to KRON 4's website “has traveled the globe covering stories from terrorism in the Middle East to devastating floods in the American Midwest.”
Now she's hawking condos. I watched a segment of another show, Bay Area Living. It appears under "Local Shows" on the station's website, where it contains no paid-programming disclaimer. The lifestyle segment begins with video of a Vacaville, California, development called Belvedere Homes and a Liviakis voiceover: “Have you ever dreamt of living in an opulent old-world estate behind beautiful entry monuments and wrought-iron gates, amidst pristine buildings and landscaping lavished in old-world luxury? Now what if all this was located right here in the Bay Area?” (Camera cuts to the anchor pulling up to the gate in a cute convertible.) “Hi everybody, I’m Vicki Liviakis. Not only did we discover this gem, but you won’t believe the price!”
Cheesy lifestyle coverage is one thing, but when "the Bay Area’s News Station" has a show called Morning News, it’s not unreasonable that viewers might expect, uh, news. But the experts featured on the show—KRON calls them Morning News Staff—are paying for the privilege. Every Thursday, the program's "Eye on Health" segment features laser eye surgeon Gary Kawesch extolling his techniques. Each Tuesday morning, Morning News anchor James Fletcher hosts "Everything 4 Pets" with various "sponsors." Anchor Darya Folsom ("for Folsom, even at a young age there was no other career but journalism," says the website) hosts "Weight Solutions" with Dr. Greg Jossart, a laproscopic surgeon. Where the financial relationships are disclosed—sometimes they aren't—they are mostly couched in the vague language of sponsorship and partnership.
I'm a curmudgeon. I listen to LPs. I have a 78 record player. I don't like to throw stuff away. But I also have Facebook and Skype and Twitter accounts. And when the old media turns to obvious desperation measures, I just can't help pondering the future of my profession and concluding, well, that we should be expecting even more fog in the future.
Follow Michael Mechanic on Twitter.





























Look, as a newspaper
Look, as a newspaper designer, I have but one request: Please, please, PLEASE stop comparing every newspaper redesign to USA Today. Honest to God, every single time a redesign comes along, someone has to make the snarky comparison, but it's never accurate. I know USA Today is used as a shorthand for everything that's wrong with newspapers today by those that think the days of letterpresses and X-acto knives were the glory days, but give it up already.
USA today
Hello Anonymous,
I didn't invent the USA Today comparison, which basically stemmed from the use of a rainbow of colored header boxes for the various sections. In this case, I think it made a lot of people think of that oh-so-fun-to-make-fun-of national paper.
Michael Mechanic is a senior editor at Mother Jones.
I know you didn't invent it.
I know you didn't invent it. But it's a cliche, and I'm asking not just you, but everyone who wants to criticize newspaper design: Don't use it.
The Chronicle has one of the
The Chronicle has one of the most popular news websites in the country - they have been a vibrant part of the Internet for years, and it's hard to think of what other gimmicks the Chronicle could invent to make SFGate a bigger draw, especially for a local news website. Hundreds of thousands of people read the Chronicle through the Internet, and a couple hundred thousand people read the print edition - the source, by the way, of the majority of the Chronicle's revenue.
So what if they want to make the newsprint edition better? A sharper newsprint edition will please hundreds of thousands of readers, as well as advertisers who want crisper photos in their ads, and bring in more revenue to support the dead-beat Internet readers, who don't want to pay for anything when it comes to a news product and yet snidely offer *zero* plausible solutions for funding the huge costs of running a news organization.
Hi Bob, I've heard the same:
Hi Bob,
I've heard the same: That SFGate gets lots of traffic, but does it bring in a positive cashflow. My intent, certainly, was not to suggest the Chronicle isn't hip to the Web. But, like most newspapers, it hasn't found a way to make the business model pay, especially given the daunting cost of a fully staffed news-gathering organization.
As for the crisper pictures, will they really bring in new readers and revenue? That's the $64,000 question. I subscribe to the Chron, but my wife and I were talking about this this morning, and we don't think most of non-journos we know in our demographic (parents in their forties) subscribe to a daily paper at all. Alas, these are the things journalists fret about. We wish everyone did.
Thanks for the reply. I
Thanks for the reply. I don't think people (not you, obviously) are grasping the shape of the disaster ahead. The costs of running a news organization are enormous - a quarter billion dollars a year, for example, at the L.A. Times only a few years ago, and that's just for salaries, rent, health care and other expenses, not including ink and paper and delivery - and there is nothing the Internet offers to provide those revenues if you're going to run an Internet-only news organization. So hundreds of journalists are just gone, finished, and we're going to end up with a bunch of micro-newsrooms with low-paid reporters sending their stuff to big websites, and hopefully there will be enough money to survive.
Oh, I grasp it. My friends
Oh, I grasp it. My friends are getting laid off or taking buyouts and are unable to find work. I fear for them, and for myself, and for the integrity of what we produce. See this Exhibit piece from Mother Jones' latest issue:
http://www.motherjones.com/media/2009/07/black-and-white-and-dead-all-over
Michael Mechanic is a senior editor at Mother Jones.
where should we go for news in and around the bay area?
the chron has been a lousy paper for a long time but what other source of news is there?
i feel like I can spend at least 1/2 hour reading the NY times website every day, I'll read lazarus in the la times and i will look at a few blogs like sfist and beyond chron. any other suggestions? The kqed weekly news program with Belva Davis? occasionally good, but the guests are mostly Chron scribes.
I'd rather get better content
About 3/4 of what I read at SF Gate is the same AP feeds I see everywhere. Most of the rest is tabloid junk and sales pitches. To find any actual news requires some serious digging.
For example, I'm a political junkie. But they rarely feature Bay Area or statewide political stories on the homepage. When I asked the senior political writer why I hadn't seen her byline for so long, she said most of her stuff is in the blog section. This used to be a navigation tab on the site. It no longer is. I had to search for blogs to find the political blog.
I don't know if the dead-tree version is this bad. But I suspect it is.
KRON must be hurting...
if they do these segments right in the middle morning newscast. My least favorite of their infomercials is Best Bay Area Businesses, with its strangely elfin, mustachioed host. This morning KRON bragged how it was the only local station to do morning news until 11am. Hmmm, wonder why that could be?
cheap gucci shoes
cheap gucci shoes cheap gucci shoes discount gucci shoes discount gucci shoes gucci shoes on sale gucci shoes on sale gucci shoes discounted gucci shoes discounted gucci boots gucci boots cheap gucci boots cheap gucci boots gucci boots on sale gucci boots on sale discount gucci boots discount gucci boots gucci boots for sale gucci boots for sale street lighting street lighting buy wow gold buy wow gold cheap wow gold cheap wow gold your infomation i have read it is very help full for me.
cheap gucci shoes
cheap gucci shoes cheap gucci shoes discount gucci shoes discount gucci shoes gucci shoes on sale gucci shoes on sale gucci shoes discounted gucci shoes discounted gucci boots gucci boots cheap gucci boots cheap gucci boots gucci boots on sale gucci boots on sale discount gucci boots discount gucci boots gucci boots for sale gucci boots for sale street lighting street lighting buy wow gold buy wow gold cheap wow gold cheap wow gold your infomation i have read it is very help full for me.
links london
links of london is the best online links london stores where you can buy the cheapest links of london jewellery and links london jewelry . Our huge selection of Ed hardy and ed hardy clothing
links london
links of london is the best online links london stores where you can buy the cheapest links of london jewellery and links london jewelry . Our huge selection of Ed hardy and ed hardy clothing