More Bailout


MORE BAILOUT….According to the fact sheet accompanying the new bailout plan, all banks with assets over $100 billion will be required to undergo a “comprehensive stress test” to make sure they’re solvent enough to continue lending even in the face of future losses. This applies to about the 20 biggest banks in the country. So what happens then?

While banks will be encouraged to access private markets to raise any additional capital needed to establish this buffer, a financial institution that has undergone a comprehensive “stress test” will have access to a Treasury provided “capital buffer” to help absorb losses and serve as a bridge to receiving increased private capital.

….Firms will receive a preferred security investment from Treasury in convertible securities that they can convert into common equity if needed to preserve lending in a worse-than-expected economic environment. This convertible preferred security will carry a dividend to be specified later and a conversion price set at a modest discount from the prevailing level of the institution’s stock price as of February 9, 2009.

Well, that’s clear as mud, isn’t it? After a thorough investigation that will supposedly force banks to face up to their losses (but not in an “overly conservative” way), they’ll then be available for government bailout money. Who qualifies? Apparently everyone. What are the terms? We’ll make that up on a case-by-case basis. How long will banks continue to be bailed out? No telling. What restrictions will be placed on bailed-out banks? None, apparently.

I’ll wait for smarter people than me to explain this stuff further, but at first glance it sure looks an awful lot like “trust us.” But we’ll see. A big part of the Geithner plan is a promise to “improve public disclosure by banks,” which will “include measures to improve the disclosure of the exposures on bank balance sheets.” If that’s done honestly, there are likely to be quite a few banks that need more than just a “preferred security investment” from the Treasury. Stay tuned.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.