Fight the League!

Orin Kerr snarks about the diverse background of Barack Obama’s shortlist of picks to succeed John Paul Stevens on the Supreme Court:

No matter who he chooses, Obama will continue to break new ground, or at least help bolster some of the low numbers of people of certain arguably underrepresented backgrounds on the current Court. For example, Elena Kagan would become only the second former Harvard professor presently on the Court (joining Justice Breyer). Either Kagan or Wood would be only the second Chicago professor (joining Justice Scalia).

….Elena Kagan would also bring notable educational diversity to the Court. Kagan would be the very first Justice ever to have attended Princeton and then Harvard Law. Obviously, that would be a major break after two consecutive nominees who had attended Princeton and then Yale Law (Justices Alito and Sotomayor). Whoever Obama picks, I think it’s clear that Obama faces a major choice and that his selection will be a historic occasion.

Stevens aside, every single justice on the Supreme Court attended an Ivy League law school (Harvard, Yale, or Columbia). It’s an East Coast conspiracy. Where are the candidates from Stanford? Cal? Michigan? Vanderbilt? Or one of those other states west of — well, everywhere. West of Delaware, anyway.

Some years ago, when I was blogging for the Washington Monthly, I remember having a conversation with its editor, Paul Glastris, about the interns they were planning to hire that summer. Basically, to a man and woman, all the good candidates were from East Coast schools. How about Ezra Klein? I said. He’s a good guy and he goes to UCLA. Strike a blow against the Ivy League mafia! And thus history was made.1

Sure, Obama went to Columbia and Harvard Law. But he’s a Hawaii guy at heart, and that’s as West Coast as it gets. So fight the power, O. Be true to your roots. Hope and change means someone from outside the Ivy League.

1Or, um, something like that. Maybe I’m overstating my role a wee bit. But who wouldn’t?

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.