Who Really Blew It in Last Night’s Seahawks-Packers Game?


So, um, football. By chance, I tuned into last night’s Packers-Seahawks game with six seconds left to play. And that turned out to be plenty! One Hail Mary later it was the blown call heard round the world, leading to an improbable Seahawks victory and a million outraged tweets about the incompetence of the replacement refs and the greediness of the NFL.

All of which I agree with.1 But I do have a question here. The call on the field2 didn’t seem wildly outrageous to me. The two refs were far enough away from the scrum that they couldn’t see who caught the ball first, and by the time they ran over it probably looked like simultaneous possession to them and therefore a Seattle reception. That’s a mistake, but frankly, it’s hardly the worst on-field mistake I’ve ever seen. These things happen.

But in replay, it was obvious that it was a Green Bay interception. So the real problem here is with the replay official who didn’t overturn the ruling on the field. But the replay officials aren’t replacement refs. They’re the same folks as always.

As it happens, I don’t care much about pro football, and I definitely don’t care much about the Seahawks and the Packers. So maybe I’m viewing this whole thing with more equanimity than it deserves. But I’m curious: who really blew it here? Seems to me it’s more the replay official than the replacement refs. What am I missing?

UPDATE: OK, I see my problem. In college ball, there’s a separate replay official who reviews calls. That’s what I’m used to. In pro ball, the replay official merely signals the referee on the field, and it’s the referee who reviews the play. So it was replacement refs who blew the initial call, and a replacement ref who blew the replay call. Sorry about the confusion.

1Seriously, I do. This is just a question about the blown call at the end of last night’s game.

2I’m talking only about the question of who caught the ball here. For the time being, I’m ignoring the missed offensive interference call.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.