Mel Brooks Can’t Stop Joking Long Enough to Make a Serious Documentary

This is a pretty good problem to have.

Mel Brooks poses for photographers at the British Academy Film Awards in 2017.Joel Ryan/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

In Mel Brooks: Unwrapped, a new documentary streaming on HBO, Brooks drums on his desk, shops at Whole Foods for pasta, and drives around Los Angeles during sunset. Often unprovoked, he bursts into song. He sits, he chats, he watches TV. He does what many people do. Except he’s Mel Brooks and he’s 93 years old and I want to watch every single second of it.

Just point the camera at Brooks so we can save as much of this natural resource as possible.

Brooks will always be known for writing, directing, and starring in his indelible movies—Blazing SaddlesThe ProducersSpaceballs, and Young Frankenstein, to name a few. He was a writer for the legendary early TV show Your Show of Shows, which made Sid Caesar, Carl Reiner, and Imogene Coca into household names. But his brilliance shines most when Brooks is simply being Brooks: riffing on talk shows, speaking with journalists, chronically unable to stop joking and performing and exaggerating and being hilarious. 

Watch him destroy on Johnny Carson or on Dick Cavett. And, yes, you’ll think: Any late-night host would kill to have Mel Brooks appear. Then try to find a clip where he isn’t funny. Promoting his 1977 film High Anxiety, he goes on Danish TV: Unconcerned with the language barrier or foreign press weirdos, Brooks hits punchline after punchline. The interviewer asks him about all his jobs directing, acting, and producing. “Well, if you hire other people,” he confides, “you’d have to pay them money.”

Brooks refuses to compartmentalize comedy into standup, movies, sketch, improv. He has a motor. He is funny—always. Like a firehose, you either turn it on or off. Alan Yentob, a longtime fixture of the BBC as a director, executive, and presenter, has been talking with Brooks for decades. He famously made two other projects about Brooks, in 1981 and 2012. Unwrapped puts this previous footage alongside more recent interviews. The product of his work is the impressionistic, scattered, wildly funny, and casual Unwrapped. It is an unhurried movie. But this is no hypermeditative slow cinema about the tedium and drama of everydayness. It’s just a camera fixed on Brooks. “Is that a good documentary?” you may ask. No! Not if you expect a conventional documentary that carefully pieces together where Brooks came from, his family, his pathos, his parents, his wives into an intimate portrait. To learn about the history of Brooks in this documentary, or any other medium, is an uphill battle because the man ruins it with jokes.

Take his childhood:

Yentob hands Brooks a childhood photo of himself. Brooks looks at it and gives him a different photo that he says is a “little better.” It is a baby picture of Robert Redford.

Yentob asks Brooks about his original name, Melvin Kaminsky. Instead of answering, he yells, “Melvin Kaminsky? Are you crazy?! NOBODY KNOWS MELVIN KAMINSKY!” 

“Was there something special about being Jewish in Brooklyn at that time?” Yentob asks later. “No,” Brooks replies, “everybody was.”

People just aren’t this good at being fun to be around! Especially not comedians offstage. (Check out a “comedy” podcast.)

For years, we have toiled in the world of “important” comedy. While some did well with the medium (early Mike Birbiglia albums, Hannah Gadsby’s Nanette, Donald Glover’s Atlanta), it became hard to imagine a great comedy that wouldn’t be praised in half-insult: It isn’t even comedy! And those were the goods ones. There were at least three different shows on major networks about a comedian becoming a comedian. Comedians became raw, real, honest, vulnerable—searching for their inner self—and boring. We overdosed on a certain kind of narcissistic truth. Brooks instead sought truth through artifice. 

“All my films are serious. They are passionate and they depict human behavior,” he tells Yentob. “They are not dramatic, that’s the difference…You’ve got to say something about the system. About the social structure. About prejudice. About people. About behavior. Comedy is not successful unless it deals with—” Brooks grabs at the air in front of him. It’s not about him, it’s about all the ephemera in the world. When Unwrapped was released, he told USA Today, “I rarely relax and actually become myself, and in this one, I do on several occasions. I’m happy that I was able to not just be funny all the time.”

 

But I feel like I’ve gotten to know him through the years even as he’s been using his humor as camouflage.

Brooks appears on Conan O’Brien’s show after the death of fellow comic legend Sid Caesar in 2014. Brooks’ first real break was writing for Caesar’s Your Show of Shows in the early 1950s. He appears on Conan, grieving but still funny. O’Brien and Brooks chat about Caesar’s great work like two old friends meeting at a wake. O’Brien shares an amazing old black-and-white clip from a routine that Brooks wrote for Caesar’s show. I won’t spoil it here. Just watch:

It is a brilliant two minutes of comedy and human insight, made all the better because, as Brooks says to O’Brien, there’s a “brushstroke of pathos” at the end. O’Brien mentions it’s one of his favorite endings to a sketch. “I stole it from…The Last Laugh,” Brooks admits. “You have to know where to steal things from.” He gets another laugh.

It seems natural. The canned, sometimes overdramatized routines comedians use to share their “story” often say more about what a comic wants you to think of them than who they actually are. Brooks’ inability to be serious accidentally reveals him. The same intimacy and vulnerability peeks out in one of the last moments in Unwrapped.

The film flashes to a sketch recorded decades ago. It is a graveyard; a TV adorns Brooks’ tombstone. In this world, Brooks died and prerecorded a message to those who visit his grave. He used to be Kaminsky, he explains, “but I’d like you to think of me as Mel Brooks, because that’s where the big bucks came in.”

Sure, death is looming for all of us, he acknowledges. And then he makes a pivot. “Actually, I’ll tell you what lives on: videotape. It’s the only substance that is immortal,” Brooks says from his fake grave. “Long live videotape.”

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate