Stealth Funding

The House just gave defense contractor Northrop Grumman the go-ahead to build nine more stealth bombers. Of course, Northrop Grumman’s money did most of the deciding.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Once again, a congressional decision has shown that money talks — or in this case, flies. The House recently voted down Rep. Ron Dellums’ (D-Calif.) proposal to eliminate $331.2 million in funding for nine B-2 stealth bombers to be built by defense contractor Northrup Grumman — nine bombers, that is, that the Pentagon and President Clinton never asked for in the first place.

This deal didn’t just fall into Northrop Grumman’s lap, though. The contractor had to buy its way in. In the last election, Northrop Grumman stealthfully carpeted federal candidates and parties with nearly $900,000 in PAC and soft money donations, according to a study by the Center for Responsive Politics. House National Security Committee members, who proposed the additional bomber funding, got an average of $2,705 from the contractor’s PAC. On the whole, the contractor’s PAC dropped $2,378 on Representatives who voted for stealth funding, ten times more those who voted against it. In the first five months of this year, the contractor’s PAC dropped $84,500 on House members, two-thirds of them Republicans.

Did it pay off? See for yourself (an N indicates a vote against cutting stealth funding):


Northrop Grumman’s Contribution Dispersal Pattern:
Key Targets

Represents $1,000

PAC contributions are inclusive from Jan. 1995-May 1997, based on Federal Election Commission data.
§ Indicates members of the House National Security Committee.

Rank Representative Vote Amount
1
Jane Harman (D-Calif.)§ N

2
Martin Frost (D-Texas) N
3(tie)
Howard P “Buck” McKeon (R-Calif.)§ N
3(tie)
Tom DeLay (R-Texas) N
4
Randy “Duke” Cunningham (R-Calif.) N
5
Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.)§ N
6
Dick Armey (R-Texas) N
7
Robert L Livingston (R-La.) N
8(tie)
Todd Tiahrt (R-Kan.) N
8(tie)
Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-Texas) N
9(tie)
C W Bill Young (R-Fla.) N
9(tie)
Ike Skelton (D-Mo.)§ N
9(tie)
John P Murtha (D-Pa.) N
9(tie)
Jerry Lewis (R-Calif.) N
9(tie)
Vic Fazio (D-Calif.) N
9(tie)
Norm Dicks (D-Wash.) N
10
Dave Weldon (R-Fla.) N

Source: The Center for Responsive Politics


You can find out how heavily Northrop Grumman targeted your Representative at Congressional Quarterly‘s Vote Watch.

WE'LL BE BLUNT:

We need to start raising significantly more in donations from our online community of readers, especially from those who read Mother Jones regularly but have never decided to pitch in because you figured others always will. We also need long-time and new donors, everyone, to keep showing up for us.

In "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, how brutal it is to sustain quality journalism right now, what makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there, and why support from readers is the only thing that keeps us going. Despite the challenges, we're optimistic we can increase the share of online readers who decide to donate—starting with hitting an ambitious $300,000 goal in just three weeks to make sure we can finish our fiscal year break-even in the coming months.

Please learn more about how Mother Jones works and our 47-year history of doing nonprofit journalism that you don't find elsewhere—and help us do it with a donation if you can. We've already cut expenses and hitting our online goal is critical right now.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

We need to start raising significantly more in donations from our online community of readers, especially from those who read Mother Jones regularly but have never decided to pitch in because you figured others always will. We also need long-time and new donors, everyone, to keep showing up for us.

In "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, how brutal it is to sustain quality journalism right now, what makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there, and why support from readers is the only thing that keeps us going. Despite the challenges, we're optimistic we can increase the share of online readers who decide to donate—starting with hitting an ambitious $300,000 goal in just three weeks to make sure we can finish our fiscal year break-even in the coming months.

Please learn more about how Mother Jones works and our 47-year history of doing nonprofit journalism that you don't find elsewhere—and help us do it with a donation if you can. We've already cut expenses and hitting our online goal is critical right now.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate