The Lewinsky Affair

How I learned to stop worrying and love presidential infidelity. Special commentary by <I>Bitch</I> editor Lisa Jervis.


It’s not often that I can be called an apologist for President Clinton. Then again, it’s not often that a sitting president gets accused of having an affair with a 22-year-old intern. However, because of the premise of this entire situation—that because of the ages and marital status of the participants consensual sex acts are somehow the business of the American people—I am stuck defending Bill. Why?

Stay with me here: We all know that the real problem, legally, is not the supposed affair but the alleged lying and subornation of perjury. And those are serious charges. But that lying never would have taken place had the president thought that he would not suffer tremendous political damage from public revelation of the affair. Of course, had he actually believed he could admit to his screwing around and get away without censure from the electorate, he would have been, to put it bluntly, totally and completely deluded. Of course he would suffer—is suffering—immense political damage. But why? Because the American people are shocked and disgusted that he would cheat on his wife with a young, naive, impressionable intern. And why is that? Because the American people have an inadequate appreciation for consent in a wide variety of relationships. They simply cannot believe that (1) Bill’s behavior is not an unforgivable betrayal of Hillary and (2) Monica Lewinsky was not somehow taken advantage of in her liaison with the prez. (The New York Times commented that the scenario could send “chills down the spine of many American parents” whose children have worked as interns.) Puh-leeze.

Let’s get a few things straight. On point (1): The Clintons have been married for 22 years. Bill has acknowledged having had at least one affair—which lasted a number of years—and he’s been accused of many more. Hillary’s a smart woman; she must know what her hubby’s up to. She has made a choice—an informed, adult choice—that this is acceptable to her. Maybe she just doesn’t care about his indiscretions. Perhaps the first couple even have some sort of agreement. Whether or not she has her own affairs is an open question. (I sure hope she does—but that’s a whole other story.)

On point (2): Lewinsky’s behavior is no one’s responsibility but her own. She is an adult and thus fully capable of making a decision about who to have sex with. Yes, I know that the president is a powerful man. Yes, I know that there are indeed situations in which those with scads of power use it to take advantage (not always sexually, though, let’s not forget) of those with less. But being turned on by power—as Lewinsky allegedly was—does not automatically make her a victim of it. (No doubt, the notion of an affair gave Lewinsky her own power trip; the leader of the free world willing to risk the current political firestorm to put his penis in her mouth.) Women can—of their own free will—be motivated by lust. The only problem with that is that people still have trouble believing it.

It’s no surprise that the president might have lied and now faces the potential collapse of his administration. He did it because he needed to: political expediency tinged with a wee bit of shame, a result of the American voting public’s moralism and a retro belief that women must be protected from the base desires of men. And that’s hard to, um, swallow.

Lisa Jervis is the editor of Bitch: Feminist Response to Pop Culture, an uppity little ‘zine printed on pulped trees.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.