Taxes Made Tolerable

A new program can help thousands of low-income workers do their taxes. So what’s the holdup?

Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.


Joe Bankman isn’t the first person to bemoan the morass that is the U.S. tax system, but he may be the first to make some huge improvements. Like, how about not having to fill out a return at all?

A professor of law at Stanford University, Bankman created Ready Return, a program that could help wage-earning Californians who don’t itemize deductions. Because the government gets everyone’s W-2 information, it has all the numbers to draft simple returns and send them out. “A good analogy is the property tax bill,” said Denise Azimi, spokeswoman for the California Franchise Tax Board. “The property tax assessor doesn’t tell you to sit down with a blank form and crunch all the numbers from the raw documents.”

This model of pro forma—or prefilled—returns is used in a number of European countries and has been discussed in the United States but never implemented. Bankman, however, has decided to take the straightforward plan to the California Legislature and make it work.

Both ends of the tax transaction could benefit. California’s Franchise Tax Board estimates that 800,000 state residents simply don’t file tax returns. “About 25 percent of people who have to file a tax return don’t have the literacy and numeracy to do it,” Bankman says. Making filing easier for the average citizen would get many more of them to pay the IRS. But a lot of these nonfilers stand to gain under the plan too. Many people eligible to file simple returns based on simple finances are likely to be minimum-wage earners, and a lot of them are actually due refunds.

Bankman has bestowed California with an elegant tax solution before. In 2003, he helped state legislators write one of the most successful tax bills in recent memory. His idea: Increase penalties for folks caught evading their taxes but also offer an amnesty period during which tax cheats could avoid the penalties if they paid up. Many did, to the tune of $1.3 billion dollars. The bill made Bankman a popular guy in Sacramento.

So when Bankman took his idea for Ready Return to California legislators, they listened, and state Controller Steve Westly (who is running for California governor in November) got on board. The result: In 2005, California debuted the program, sending prefilled returns to a pilot group of 50,000 single, low-income Californians. Recipients could sign the Ready Return as is; correct it and sign; file or correct it online; or, if they didn’t want it, toss it and start from scratch. By the time the mailings arrived, about half the recipients had already filed. Of the other half, 11,523 elected to use the Ready Return. And they liked it. There were some technical complaints, but most of the comments from users looked like this:

  • “This is the simplest, most convenient tax-filing system ever. I really am impressed. Thanks for including me in the pilot program.”

  • “Great program and easy to use, although I am computer illiterate.”

  • “Wonderful. Wish the Feds would make it this easy.”
  • At a meeting in June, California officials voted unanimously to expand Ready Return and make it a permanent program. They originally planned to reach a million taxpayers this year without increasing their budget. Then, when personal-finance software giant Intuit, tax-preparation company H&R Block, and others saw their livelihoods threatened they managed to block expansion of the program, limiting it to just 50,000 people again in 2006.

    Nevertheless, Westly intends to push for expansion of the program, despite the opposition.

    Says Fred Goldberg, a Washington, D.C., tax attorney and former IRS commissioner who likes the project: “What sways me is, Are you doing right by the people? That sounds corny, but that’s the issue.”

    From the desk of Mother Jones CEO, Monika Bauerlein...

    Newsrooms can be funded in many ways. One of the most controversial (and volatile) ways is by a for-profit corporation or a billionaire owner. We see it across the headlines on a weekly basis: the claw backs in public media, the gutting of The Washington Post, the bending over backwards to appeal to Trump and his allies.

    But not here.

    When Mother Jones first started publishing 50 years ago, our founders made a critical decision: to be a reader-supported nonprofit. They knew that no corporate owner would be interested in a muckraking newsroom; they also knew that no muckraking newsroom would be interested in following the agenda of a corporate owner.

    And so, we’ve been reader-funded for half a century. We rely on contributions from our readers—readers like you—whether it’s $50, or $15 a month, or whatever fits your budget. People give what they can, and every donation makes a difference for our newsroom, which has grown tremendously—in size and reach and renown—since its inception in 1976.

    You may be wondering: What does it take to publish an investigation? And what does my donation actually fund? The answers are one and the same: It takes people, resources, and time. And that’s what your donation funds directly.

    Every donation Mother Jones receives from readers fortifies our newsroom, whether we’re covering underreported scandals out of Washington, DC, or the most important news of the day. And right now, each donation will be doubled because of our $50,000 match. So when you make a donation—$5, $50, any amount—it’ll go twice as far.

    Your support keeps us going. If you’re able, donate today.

    Thanks for reading.

    —Monika

    From the desk of Mother Jones CEO, Monika Bauerlein...

    Newsrooms can be funded in many ways. One of the most controversial (and volatile) ways is by a for-profit corporation or a billionaire owner. We see it across the headlines on a weekly basis: the claw backs in public media, the gutting of The Washington Post, the bending over backwards to appeal to Trump and his allies.

    But not here.

    When Mother Jones first started publishing 50 years ago, our founders made a critical decision: to be a reader-supported nonprofit. They knew that no corporate owner would be interested in a muckraking newsroom; they also knew that no muckraking newsroom would be interested in following the agenda of a corporate owner.

    And so, we’ve been reader-funded for half a century. We rely on contributions from our readers—readers like you—whether it’s $50, or $15 a month, or whatever fits your budget. People give what they can, and every donation makes a difference for our newsroom, which has grown tremendously—in size and reach and renown—since its inception in 1976.

    You may be wondering: What does it take to publish an investigation? And what does my donation actually fund? The answers are one and the same: It takes people, resources, and time. And that’s what your donation funds directly.

    Every donation Mother Jones receives from readers fortifies our newsroom, whether we’re covering underreported scandals out of Washington, DC, or the most important news of the day. And right now, each donation will be doubled because of our $50,000 match. So when you make a donation—$5, $50, any amount—it’ll go twice as far.

    Your support keeps us going. If you’re able, donate today.

    Thanks for reading.

    —Monika

    We Recommend

    Latest

    Sign up for our free newsletter

    Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

    Get our award-winning magazine

    Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

    Subscribe

    INDEPENDENT. BECAUSE OF YOU.

    Mother Jones has no billionaires calling the shots—just readers like you making fearless reporting possible

    Donate