The Dems Debate in South Carolina: Ugh


dems-debate-south-carolina.jpg It was bound to happen. If you insist on 10,000 debates in a four or five month period, you are going to cover every policy difference, philosophical difference, and tonal difference. It’s all over but the shouting, as they say.

And that’s what we got tonight with the Democrats’ debate in South Carolina: the shouting. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton traded so many jabs and talked over each other so many times that it’s hard to remember any one line—the only thing that sticks in the mind, just half an hour later, is the sound of constant squabbling.

And it’s bad for the Democratic Party. Every time the Democratic candidates launch attacks on each other, they provide the eventual Republican nominee with ammunition. Not to mention the fact that they obscure their strengths and highlight their weaknesses.

The media coverage is already all about “tensions flaring.” Immediately after the debate ended, Anderson Cooper started reshowing the debate’s contentious moments. I’m not going to recap any of them here—you can read about them elsewhere or see them on YouTube, but suffice to say, they were simply sharper versions of what you have already heard.

Two moments of actual substance:

Edwards, who struggled for air time, introduced the idea of John McCain as the presumptive Republican nominee. The point was that only he could beat McCain. Clinton replied that if McCain is the nominee, only she has the foreign policy chops to go toe-to-toe with the Arizona senator. Obama responded by saying that Clinton’s argument was essentially, “I’m the closest to McCain.” The better argument for a progressive, Obama argued, is that we need a whole new foreign policy paradigm that rejects the conventional wisdom and adopts a whole new way of thinking.

The second worthwhile moment was on the topic of health care. Obama reiterated his point that he doesn’t believe in mandates; his belief is that people want health care and simply can’t afford it. If you make health care more affordable, the 47 million uninsured will disappear because they will buy into the system voluntarily. Both Edwards and Clinton attacked Obama for defending a plan that is not truly universal.

Obama was busy fending off blows the entire night: at first just from Clinton, but later from both Clinton and Edwards. (Edwards has to stick around, if only for his role in these debates. He is a pressure valve—the moderators go to him when things get too tense between HRC and BHO.) Pundits will say that Obama’s place at the center of the action means he won. He absorbed a ton of blows but gave better than he got. But in truth, every Democrat was a loser today.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.