Sotomayor: First Hispanic SCOTUS Justice

White House Photo


By a vote of 68-31—supported by all Democrats present—the US Senate confirmed Sonia Sotomayor for the Supreme Court, making her the first Hispanic justice. Though her confirmation was all but assured, Sotomayor had emerged as a divisive figure among conservatives, who claim that her judicial philosophy is tainted by ethnic favoritism. They cited an appeals court decision Sotomayor made upholding an affirmative action law that was seen to harm a group of white firefighters in Connecticut, in addition to a comment she made about the merits of a “wise Latina” judge.

But Sotomayor’s conservative critics never gained traction, perhaps due to the political stigma associated with attacking Hispanics, a demographic the GOP hopes to win over in future election cycles. Still, only nine Republicans voted for Sotomayor. Speaking directly after the vote, Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) joked that Republicans would have been dissatisfied with anyone Obama nominated, no matter how qualified. “If the President had nominated Moses… they would have voted no,” he said, trying to stifle laughter.

The statements of support are already coming out.

First, the nominator himself:

Like so many other aspects of this nation, I’m filled with pride in this achievement and great confidence that Judge Sotomayor will make an outstanding Supreme Court justice. This is a wonderful day for Judge Sotomayor and her family, but I also think it’s a wonderful day for America.

The Service Employees’ International Union:

[T]he janitors, nurses, security guards, bus drivers and other hardworking members of SEIU have proudly stood with her because her personal story of achievement has given her a rare insight into the lives of people who get up and go to work each day to make a better life for their families.”

Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence:

[B]y confirming [Sotomayor] today, the U.S. Senate refused to be intimidated by the National Rifle Association and instead did what’s right for the country and the rule of law.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.