Is Bonner Still Lying to Congress?

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


In the never-ending ethics scandal that is Bonner and Associates, today’s news is that their independent ethics adviser, American University professor James Thurber, is severing his relationship with the group—and may never have been formally retained at all.

This comes less than a week after Thurber took out a full-page ad in Roll Call praising Jack Bonner and raising questions about the how ethical their new ethics adviser could really be.

Thurber now tells Roll Call it was a “mistake” and a “lapse in judgment” to run the ad, which was taken out at his behest on behalf of the Center for Congressional and Presidential Studies. The ad praised Bonner for “over 15 years of teaching excellence” and ran soon after Bonner testified before Congress about the forged letters his group sent to Congress.

To make matters worse, many of the people name-dropped in Thurber’s ad as “notable guest lecturers” in Bonner’s grassroots lobbying workshop were not even notified about the ad before it ran. Many of them are, understandably, “outraged” to have their names appropriated to support someone whose firm is currently under investigation for lying to Congress. While Bonner was apparently given a sneak-peak of the ad before it ran, the folks listed were never asked about appearing in the ad.

Not only is Thurber ending his relationship with Bonner, he now says that there was never a contractual agreement for him to advise Bonner in the first place. “I mentioned to Mr. Bonner his need for ethics training for his staff…. There was no contractual arrangement for me to be involved with Bonner and Associates pro bono or otherwise,” he said in a statement.

But in his testimony to Congress last month, Bonner said that the group had retained Thurber as an “independent Ethical Standards Advisor,” part of the five-step plan for quality control they were supposedly instating. Thurber, Bonner said, is “well-regarded as maintaining the highest ethical standards and independence” and would be retained to “review our policies and work with us to continue to improve our internal quality control system to the highest standards.”

Bonner’s spokesperson tells TPMmuckraker that Thurber must either be speaking “in error” or “probably didn’t remember” agreeing to be their adviser. “Professor Thurber told us that he would provide ethics training without fee, and he has now told us that he has decided he will not do that.”

It’s hard to decide which looks worse for Bonner—that they would retain an adviser who so flagrantly violated a reasonable understanding of ethics and independence with the ad, or that the group apparently lied to Congress about retaining him in the first place.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate