Do Cheap Airfare Specials Hurt the Environment—or Help It?

Flickr/<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/duncanh1/" target="_blank">~Duncan~</a>

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis and more, subscribe to Mother Jones' newsletters.


A while back, I griped about the environmental irresponsibility of a recent JetBlue promotion that offered $20 last-minute round trip fares to various US cities. A bunch of commenters pointed out that in a way, specials like this actually save CO2 emissions, since they put butts in would-be empty seats. But I was still skeptical: Even if cheap fares help fill seats, don’t they just create more demand for flights in the long run?

The short answer is that it depends on the nature of your trip. Mikhail Chester, a UC-Berkeley post-doctoral researcher in civil and environmental engineering, points out that sometimes cheap fares can actually help prevent car trips. “If you were planning on driving from San Francisco to LA, but you decide to hop on a cheap flight at the last minute instead, that’s one less car trip,” says Chester. “But if you buy a cheap ticket on a whim, that’s different.” Let’s say I had gone to Austin for the evening, like my roommate wanted to. All of a sudden, we’re talking restaurants, bars, hotel stay, and maybe even a car rental—all of which create emissions I would have avoided by spending a quiet evening at home.

But the long answer is more complicated, and it helps to understand why airlines offer bargain fares in the first place. Chester’s colleague Megan Smirti Ryerson studies airline-ticket pricing models. Ryerson explained to me that although airlines typically don’t make money on these deals, cheap flights do help them stay competitive. At many airports, each airline is alotted a certain number of take-off time slots every hour. “If you don’t use your slot 80 percent of the time, you’re going to lose it to one of your competitors,” says Ryerson. So in the long run, it makes more financial sense for an airline to keep all of its slots than give them up, even if the flights aren’t completely full. “It would be so much more efficient to get everyone on a larger plane and have less frequent flights,” says Ryerson. “But in order to be competitive, airlines have to oversupply frequency to assert their market dominance.”

Cheap fares are also an excellent marketing strategy, says Ryerson. “JetBlue tweets to their millions of followers about the deals, and those tweets get retweeted,” she says. “It gets people to the website. And even if those people don’t use the cheap fares, maybe they are looking for another flight.”

Bottom line: Considering that planes will probably take off regardless of whether they’re full, indulging in a cheap flight once in a while is okay, especially if you’re saving a car trip. But don’t allow those JetBlue specials to let you forget about air travel’s giant carbon footprint. If everyone flew less overall (which would be a whole lot easier if our rail system wasn’t so inconvenient and slow), maybe airlines wouldn’t find it worth their while to send all those half-empty planes up into the air in the first place.

Got a burning eco-quandary? Submit it to econundrums@motherjones.com. Get all your green questions answered by signing up for our weekly Econundrums newsletter here.

Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.