White House to Franklin Graham: You’re “Preposterous”

After the evangelist (and son of legendary Billy Graham) played the birther card on ABC, Jay Carney curtly notes that he abused Easter Sunday.

Robin Nelson/Zuma


The day after Easter, the Obama White House took a shot at one of the nation’s more prominent religious leaders—albeit a careful and restrained shot.

For Easter Sunday, the producers of ABC’s This Week thought it would be good programming to have host Christiane Amanpour chat with Franklin Graham, the evangelical leader and son of legendary evangelist Billy Graham.

Amanpour introduced Graham as a religious leader “who continues his father’s crusades, preaching to millions of people around the world. He also serves as the president of Samaritan’s Purse, an international aid organization that does relief work in the developing world with missionary zeal.” She neglected to mention that Graham has called Islam “a very evil and wicked religion and that last year Graham was disinvited from a National Prayer Breakfast event at the Pentagon after his Islam-bashing became an issue. Nor did she note that last month Graham claimed that the Muslim Brotherhood has “infiltrated every level” of the Obama administration.

Her first question to Graham was a softball: “What’s the word that you most dearly associate with Easter?” He replied, “It’s God’s love, it’s the sacrifice of Jesus Christ.” Moments later, he contended that the government has undermined the traditional church function of assisting the poor because it took this mission “away from the church, and…had more money to give and more programs to give, and pretty soon, the churches just backed off.” He went on to note that “we are in the latter days” and that when the anti-Christ comes, “He’ll have an economic mark that will be on [his] forehand.” Whatever that means.

Amanpour eventually raised Graham’s “controversial comments about Islam,” without noting what they were. To which he responded, “I love Muslim people. I don’t believe that Muhammad can lead anybody to Heaven.” She did not press him further on this front. She devoted more time to whom Graham fancies among the potential 2012 GOP candidates. After Graham remarked that celebrity mogul Donald Trump might be his candidate of choice, Amanpour asked whether Trump’s unrelenting advocacy of birtherism bothers Graham. Not at all, Graham replied, adding that the president “has some issues to deal with here” regarding his birth certificate. Graham also questioned whether Obama was truly a committed Christian—though he did acknowledge that “God is the only one who knows his heart.”

And that was it. Amanpour allowed Graham to drop a birther bomblet without forcing him to defend his remarks, as well as squeezing in some doubt about the authenticity of the president’s Christian beliefs. The interview was an Easter gift to those on the right who believe the president is a secret Muslim plotting the end of the United States of America. ABC News had provided a much-coveted platform to a fellow who has publicly said Obama’s government is riddled with Muslim Brotherhood agents at the most senior levels—that is, someone who promotes conspiratorial crackpottery.

Graham’s birther-friendly remarks did catch some attention on the Intertubes. But there was not much controversy about his appearance on the show. On Monday afternoon, at the daily White House press briefing, I asked press secretary Jay Carney if the White House was concerned that a national religious leader was charging that Obama has been shifty about his birth records and has allowed the Muslim Brotherhood to penetrate his administration. Carney offered this in reply: It was “unfortunate” that Graham “chose Easter Sunday to make preposterous charges.” There was a touch of anger in Carney’s voice, but just a touch, and he did not elaborate. He then left the lectern and departed the briefing room.

Obama has been quite kind to Graham’s ailing father and has prayed with the elder and younger Graham. Despite that, Franklin Graham spreads conspiratorial swill about the president—without much challenge from the media. And the White House obviously calculates it can only go so far in publicly denouncing Graham. Consequently, there’s not much disincentive for Graham to change his ways. How long might it be before Graham asks to examine Obama’s forehand?

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate