Keystone XL Pipeline Path Mows Through Prime Triceratops Turf

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/etee/3302691513/sizes/m/in/photostream/">etee</a>/Flickr

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis and more, subscribe to Mother Jones' newsletters.


The Keystone XL pipeline, which would transport oil from the Canadian tar sands to Texas refineries, is already unpopular, possibly unsafe, and almost certainly unclean, but a closer look at the pipe’s planned path reveals that it might also be stepping on some very old toes—65 million years old, in fact.

More than 100 miles of the proposed path cuts across one of the nation’s richest fossil fields, InsideClimate News reports. The Hell Creek Formation, which covers a large swath of southeastern Montana, is famous for its prodigious supply of triceratops fossils. (Many other prehistoric creatures, including T-rex and the aquatic plesiosaur, have also been found nearby.) As the pipe is laid underground in the area, the excavation is practically guaranteed to unearth all kinds of old bones, according to George Stanley, a University of Montana paleontologist. Unless they are protected properly, he adds, most fossils will start decomposing shortly after being exposed to air.

Given this, you might expect to see America’s paleontologists raising pickaxes in protest, but not so fast. “Paleontologists are looking at this as a double-edged sword,” Stanley told me. “The reaction is pretty much polarized.”

That’s because such a massive dig could also be a great opportunity to find cool stuff. “We paleontologists like it when people dig holes in the ground,” notes Montana State University paleontologist John Horner. But not all of them, apparently. Here’s InsideClimate News:

Paleontologist Peter Larson fears the construction equipment will grind up everything in its path. “The machines move so fast … [any fossils] will go through the shredder,” he said.

Hell Creek formation and surrounding area.: Hell Creek Formation: A 2001 Synthesis, Kirk Johnson et alHell Creek formation and surrounding area. From “Hell Creek Formation: A 2001 Synthesis,” Kirk Johnson et al

Central to the debate is whether paleontologists will get to supervise the excavation; Stanley is worried that TransCanada, the Canadian behemoth behind the project, might substitute archeologists—who may fulfill the legal requirement for monitoring the pipeline’s impact, but are more focused on ancient dwellings or artifacts than fossils—for paleontologists. However, in an email statement, a TransCanada spokesman said:

Paleontological monitors will be monitoring construction for paleo resources in the entire Hell Creek formation… [Local legal] conditions require us to cease work at the location where the fossils were found, assess them for significance, and develop a plan for agency approval to address how to treat the fossils. One option is to move the route to avoid the resource.

Indeed, the paleontologist Paul Murphey, who authored a report on the region for the US State Department last year, told InsideClimate News that the route has already been changed several times based on his recommendations. The report details the pipe’s potential paleontological impact and identifies the Hell Creek formation as particularly sensitive, but suggests that the pipeline is unlikely to pass through any new, unidentified fossil fields.

The Obama administration has yet to approve the pipeline officially, although the State Department recently issued a statement claiming the environmental impact would be minimal, a position hotly contested by leading climate scientists. One way or the other, “paleontologists should be involved,” Stanley says. “It’s a fossil wonderland.”

Must read: Josh Harkinson’s feature story, “Scenes From the Tar Wars.”

Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.