Flowchart: Are You a Slut?

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/siebeneinhalb-de/502044088/sizes/z/in/photostream/">d.loop</a>/Flickr

Are you a slut? It’s a question that, to be perfectly honest, we would have felt more than a little uncomfortable asking as recently as a few weeks ago. For one, there’s the word itself—as misogynistic an insult as you could conjure. And there wasn’t much of a peg, what with the rest of the world focused on more pressing issues, like Israel’s threats of conflict with Iran, and jokes about Mitt Romney’s dog (this is a particularly good one).

But then conservative icon Rush Limbaugh—who was once caught trying to bring 29 100 mg Viagra pills with him to the Dominican Republic—spent three days ripping into Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke (rhymes with “look”), calling her a “slut” and a “prostitute” for testifying before Congress about birth control, and suggesting that he’d like her to send him a sex tape. The #iamnotaslut Twitter campaign went viral; Limbaugh began losing sponsors (20, at last count). And now we can’t seem to talk about anything else but “sluts.” Seriously, just take a look at this chart from BuzzFeed.

The national conversation about sluts of 2012 hasn’t really given us much clarity—but it has given a variety of commentators a platform from which to disseminate their definition of “slut.” Which, it turns out, is really, really broad. Fluke—who noted in her testimony about contraception access that she has a friend who uses the pill out of medical necessity—has been maligned for oversharing about her sex life, which she didn’t even discuss on the Hill. One Georgetown law school classmate of Fluke’s quoted in the National Review put it worst: “When did Georgetown Law start admitting Kardashians?”

So back to that question: Are you a slut? It’s a head-scratcher, so we’ve put together this handy flowchart to help you out:

 

‘,
connects: {
‘quit_telling’ : ‘No’,
‘viagra’ : ‘Yes’
}
},
quit_telling : {
html: ‘

Whoa. Quit telling everyone about your sex life! Are you a dude?

‘,
connects: {
‘rock_on’ : ‘Yes’,
‘medical’ : ‘No’
}
},
viagra : {
html: ‘

Do you take Viagra?

‘,
connects: {
‘earlier’ : ‘No’,
‘flying_high’ : ‘Yes’
}
},
earlier : {
html: ‘

Um. Maybe we should have asked earlier: Are you a female?

‘,
connects: {
‘rock_on’ : ‘No’,
‘slut’ : ‘Yes’
}
},
rock_on : {
html: ‘

Of course you’re not a slut; you’re a dude! Rock on, bro!


},
rock_on1 : {
html: ‘

Of course you’re not a slut; you’re a dude! Rock on, bro!


},
slut : {
html: ‘

You’re a slut. Sorry, we don’t make the rules. The plaque is in the mail.


},
flying_high : {
html: ‘

Have you ever tried bringing 29 100-mg Viagra pills with you to the Dominican Republican?

‘,
connects: {
‘really’ : ‘Yes’,
‘rock_on’ : ‘No’
}
},
really : {
html: ‘

Wait, really?

‘,
connects: {
‘rock_on1’ : ‘Yes’,
‘rock_on’ : ‘No’
}
},
medical : {
html: ‘

🙁 You might still be a slut. Do you use birth control for other medical reasons?

‘,
connects: {
‘slut’ : ‘Yes’,
‘kids_only’ : ‘No’
}
},
kids_only : {
html: ‘

Wait, so, sex only for the sake of having kids. No birth control. Nothing. Really?

‘,
connects: {
‘slut’ : ‘No’,
‘do_you_think’ : ‘Yes’
}
},
do_you_think : {
html: ‘

Do you think women who use birth control are sluts?

‘,
connects: {
‘not_slut’ : ‘Yes’,
‘slut’ : ‘No’
}
},
not_slut : {
html: ‘

Congrats! You’re totally not a slut.
}
},
{});

Here it is in chart form, for the clicking-impaired:

Photos: Sean Wandzilak/Shutterstock.com; Courtesy of Pepsi/YouTube; Louis Lopez/Cal Sports/ZumaPress.com; Jiri Hera/Shutterstock.com; Lasse Kristensen/Shutterstock.com; Kirill Vorobyev /Shutterstock.com; Subbotina Anna/Shutterstock.com; Jeff Thrower/Shutterstock.com; Foonia/Shutterstock.com; .shock/Shutterstock.com; Orhan Cam/Shutterstock.com; Monkey Business Images/Shutterstock.com

OUR NEW CORRUPTION PROJECT

The more we thought about how MoJo's journalism can have the most impact heading into the 2020 election, the more we realized that so many of today's stories come down to corruption: democracy and the rule of law being undermined by the wealthy and powerful for their own gain.

So we're launching a new Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption. We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We'll publish what we find as a major series in the summer of 2020, including a special issue of our magazine, a dedicated online portal, and video and podcast series so it doesn't get lost in the daily deluge of breaking news.

It's unlike anything we've done before and we've got seed funding to get started, but we're asking readers to help crowdfund this new beat with an additional $500,000 so we can go even bigger. You can read why we're taking this approach and what we want to accomplish in "Corruption Isn't Just Another Scandal. It's the Rot Beneath All of Them," and if you like how it sounds, please help fund it with a tax-deductible donation today.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate