Elizabeth Warren Blasts Her Republican Colleagues for Obstructing Obama’s Nominees

GOP obstructionism over Merrick Garland pushed her over the edge.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) meets with Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland in April.Douliery Olivier/AP


Sen. Elizabeth Warren is fed up with Republicans’ obstruction in Congress. In a report released Monday detailing Senate Republicans’ efforts to block President Barack Obama’s judicial and executive nominees, Warren’s office accused the majority party in the Senate of striving to keep key government positions “empty as long as possible,” thereby fueling a “new and dangerous Republican extremism.”

“The idea that Senate Republicans are willing to leave [the Supreme Court] short-handed for nearly a year seems shocking,” the Massachusetts Democrat noted in a press release accompanying the 13-page report. “But the fact is that, for more than seven years, they have waged an unrelenting campaign to keep key positions throughout government empty.”

Obama nominated Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court in March, a month after the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. But Republican leaders in Congress have refused to consider Garland’s nomination, insisting instead that the spot should be filled by the next president.

According to Warren’s report, such delays have been standard throughout Obama’s presidency. Fewer of Obama’s judicial nominees have been confirmed than under previous presidents, and those who have been approved faced a longer confirmation process.

Meanwhile, the confirmation process for executive officials—including Attorney General Loretta Lynch, former Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, and Labor Secretary Thomas Perez—has slowed to a crawl. A study from the Duke Law Journal cited in the report found that the average time the Senate took to confirm a president’s nominees climbed from 59 days under Ronald Reagan to 127 days during Obama’s first six years in office.

“Senate Republicans should have stood up to this extremism years ago—but it is not too late to do so now,” Warren’s report notes. “It just takes some political courage.”

Read the full report here.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.