Democrats Launched a New Effort to Shut Down the Congressional Panel Investigating Planned Parenthood

The panel was recently awarded more federal funding.

<a href="http://www.istockphoto.com/portfolio/crossstudio?mediatype=photography&facets=%7B%22pageNumber%22:1,%22perPage%22:100,%22abstractType%22:%5B%22photos%22,%22illustrations%22,%22video%22,%22audio%22%5D,%22order%22:%22bestMatch%22,%22filterContent%22:%22false%22,%22portfolioID%22:%5B10499504%5D,%22additionalAudio%22:%22true%22,%22f%22:true%7D">crossstudio</a>/iStock

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Nearly a year and a half has passed since David Daleiden released surreptitiously recorded videos that purported to show Planned Parenthood officials involved in the illegal sale of fetal tissue for profit. More than a dozen state investigations were launched into the women’s health care provider, along with four congressional inquiries, and none of those efforts discovered any form of wrongdoing. 

After more than a year of failed efforts to unearth some form of illicit activity by Planned Parenthood, Congressional Republicans are reinvigorating the work of a select investigative panel by seeking an additional $800,000 in funding—bringing the total taxpayer dollars spent on their endeavor up to $1.59 million. The House voted to approve the additional funding on December 1, saying a doctor’s remarks in sting videos were “disturbing, horrific, and unacceptable.

But Democrats have also escalated their efforts to put an end to this work. At the beginning of this week, Democratic members of the Select Investigative Panel of the House Energy and Commerce Committee released a 112-page report to address the “grave abuses” wrought by Republicans since the panel was formed with Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) at its helm.

“When Congress spends well over a million taxpayer dollars, hardworking Americans should expect that something good will result—that their lives will be made better,” said Select Panel Ranking Member Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) in a statement. “Here, the results are the exact opposite.”

She described the panel as a damaging, “purely partisan witch-hunt against researchers and doctors.” The panel faced criticism for endangering university and hospital researchers and employees at Planned Parenthood and StemExpress. In June, Rep. Blackburn sent two letters to the Obama administration that included the unredacted identities of several researchers and clinic staffers. The letters were also posted to the panel’s website. A spokesman from Blackburn’s office insisted that they “just made a mistake.” But Rep. Schakowsky noted, “The Panel has endangered doctors and researchers; and studies and clinical trials on diseases and conditions like multiple sclerosis have been delayed or halted.”

Republicans on the panel have also been pursuing accusations that StemExpress, a small tissue procurement company in Northern California, was involved in the sale of fetal tissue for profit. Even though fetal tissue procurement represents less than 1 percent of her company’s business, the allegations from the panel led to death threats aimed at StemExpress CEO Cate Dyer.

The Democrats’ report makes five recommendations. They call on Congress to support fetal tissue research in the name of medical progress, to pass legislation that would aim to protect reproductive health care providers and patients from violent anti-abortion activists, and to reject all proposals to “defund Planned Parenthood.” The Democratic members also suggest implementing procedures to ensure bipartisan cooperation in future select investigative panels and legislation to ensure reproductive health care access, which the incoming Trump administration might put in jeopardy.

The panel will formally expire once the 115th Congress takes over in January, but it’s possible it could take on a new form, and the new round of funding increases that likelihood.

After the additional funding for the panel was approved, Blackburn released the following statement: “Considering all that our Panel has identified, despite having barely a year to conduct this investigation, it is now up to us to build on this work, to hold our government accountable, and to stop these affronts to human dignity.”

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate