Betsy DeVos Once Again Stumbles When Asked About LGBT Discrimination at Private Schools

”This department,” she said, ”is not going to be issuing decrees.”

Susan Walsh/AP

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis and more, subscribe to Mother Jones' newsletters.

At a tense Senate hearing Tuesday, Education Secretary Betsy DeVos wouldn’t commit to stripping federal funding from private schools that discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation, saying it was an issue for “Congress and the courts to settle.”

“On areas where the law is unsettled,” she said, “this department is not going to be issuing decrees.”

DeVos’ comments echoed what she said in a House hearing in May, when she notably refused to say whether federal dollars would be pulled from schools that discriminate against LGBT students. She said at the time that states and local communities would be “best equipped to make decisions and framework on behalf of their students.” 

But DeVos’ argument didn’t satisfy Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), who argued Wednesday that federal civil rights laws that protect LGBT students can be “somewhat foggy.” Federal laws protect students from being discriminated against based on race, color, national origin, disability, and gender, but the courts have yet to decide whether those protections explicitly include LGBT students. 

In response, DeVos repeated a line she used throughout the hearing: that schools receiving federal funding needed to follow the law. She then added that when federal law is unsettled, it’s left to Congress and the Supreme Court to decide where LGBT students fall under civil rights protections.

Merkley, however, wasn’t satisfied. “I think it’s important for the public to know that today the secretary of education, before this committee, refused to affirm that she would put forward a program that would ban discrimination based on LGBTQ status of students or ban discrimination based on religion,” he said. 

“That’s not what I said,” DeVos shot back. “Discrimination in any form is wrong.”  

The back-and-forth came in a Senate appropriations subcommittee hearing during which DeVos faced pushback from Democrats and Republicans over the president’s proposal to slice $10.6 billion from the Education Department’s budget.

Later in the hearing, Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) challenged DeVos on whether there would be protections in place in the administration’s school choice program to make sure public dollars “don’t just enrich” for-profit education organizations. He pointed to K12 Inc., a virtual school company in which DeVos and her billionaire husband had once invested. DeVos dodged the question, noting that what mattered was student performance, not the company’s tax status. 

Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.