Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Blasts Trump Officials for Census Citizenship Question

“I want to know about racism and the very disturbing history that we’re seeing here.”

Tom Williams/Zuma

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) lashed out against the Trump administration’s effort to add a citizenship question to the census during a House Oversight Committee hearing Wednesday.

A citizenship question on the census could intimidate non-citizen residents of the United States and cause immigrant communities to be undercounted in the 2020 census. Because the number of representatives in Congress is determined by population, rather than number of citizens, a question about citizenship could deny political representation to immigrant communities and shift power to whiter, more Republican areas.

Some powerful Republicans, such as Steve Bannon and Kris Kobach, have pushed for a citizenship question because it could help swing Congressional power to the GOP.

At Wednesday’s hearing, the House Oversight Committee moved to hold Attorney General William Barr and Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross in contempt of Congress for refusing to comply with subpoenas related to the Trump administration’s decisions about the citizenship question.

“I want to know why this question was magically added after we have seen that a political operative knew and detailed an intent to intimidate racial and immigrant communities for a partisan purpose, saying this will hurt Democrats and help Republicans,” Ocasio-Cortez said. “I want to know about racism and the very disturbing history that we’re seeing here.”

Ocasio-Cortez noted that changes to the census typically take five years of testing to be approved, but that the citizenship question has been in the works for only two years.

The US Constitution mandates that the census count “the whole number of persons in each State,” which was reaffirmed in the 2016 Supreme Court case Evenwel v. Abbott.

“This is about the rule of law,” Ocasio-Cortez said, “this is about the respect for our institutions, and this is about the power of all of us as a body, as United States Congress, and the integrity of the government of the United States.”

Watch her testimony below.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend


Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.


Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.


Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.