Trump’s Republican Rivals Are Funneling Money to Daniel Penny

Gov. Ron DeSantis said he “stands” with “Good Samaritans” like the former Marine charged with manslaughter.

Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy speaks at an event in Iowa last month.Charlie Neibergall/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

After Daniel Penny was charged on Friday with manslaughter for choking Jordan Neely to death on the F train, Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-Fla.) tweeted a link to donate to Penny’s legal defense fund. “We stand with Good Samaritans like Daniel Penny,” DeSantis wrote. “Let’s show this Marine…America’s got his back.”

Other Republicans followed suit. “I agree with this. Just donated,” Vivek Ramaswamy, the self-funding presidential candidate, responded on Sunday. “More of us should. We must restore the rule of law in America.” Ramaswamy gave $10,000, so far the second largest of the more than 46,000 donations totaling over two million dollars sent via the Christian crowdfunding site GiveSendGo.

Earlier this month, Neely, a thirty-year-old unhoused man in the midst of a mental health crisis, made some of his fellow passengers feel uncomfortable and potentially unsafe. A 24-year-old former Marine came from behind and put him in a fatal chokehold for about 15 minutes, even though a bystander said 98 out of 100 people would have waited to see “one more sign that indicates aggression.” DeSantis and others on the right responded by comparing Penny to the Samaritan who provided aid to a man robbers beat and left to die. 

As his rivals defended Penny, Donald Trump remained silent on his highly active social media feed—avoiding a chance to attack Alvin Bragg, the New York District Attorney who charged both him and Penny. When asked about Neely’s death in an interview published Monday, Trump was unusually reserved in his support of Penny. “So, I haven’t seen the tapes,” Trump said. “I won’t make a definitive [statement] but it looks to me like the people in that car were in great danger.”

This isn’t totally unprecedented. Force was often justified for Trump—a man who’d once taken out a full-page ad in the New York Times that implied that five Black and Latino teenagers, who were later exonerated, should be executed—but it wasn’t always. In May 2020, four days after Derek Chauvin murdered George Floyd, Trump did not defend what was captured on video and said the Justice Department should investigate as quickly as possible. “It’s a terrible thing. We all saw what we saw,” Trump said. “Should never be allowed to happen a thing like that. But we’re determined that justice be served.” That summer, he wondered why a Wisconsin police officer had shot Jacob Blake in the back multiple times. “Couldn’t you have wrestled him?” Trump asked. “But they choke. Just like in a golf tournament, they miss a three-foot putt.”

Trump’s stance caused some backlash. An editor at Chronicles, a far-right magazine dedicated to defending “the traditions of America and the West,” quickly called Trump’s comments on the death of Neely “pathetic.”

Diverging from Trump, some on the right have attempted to elevate Penny to ever higher levels of valor.

Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) called him a “subway Superman.” A New York Post editor wrote that the “only difference between Daniel Penny and the heroic passengers aboard United 93 is he’s been charged with manslaughter by a usually soft-on-crime Manhattan DA.”

On Twitter, Gavin Wax, the head of the New York Young Republican Club captioned a tweet of Penny in handcuffs: “This man is a hero.” Wax then shared a reply from an anonymous user that claimed Penny “is no different than the frontiersmen that settled America – brave and fearless against foes.”

The post effectively adopted a darker narrative, that Penny, who has said he did not intend to harm anyone, was a vigilante eager to kill. The only difference was that this was now presented as something to be celebrated.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate