Candace Owens and the Far-Right Influencer Who Helped Make Antisemitism Mainstream

Stew Peters’s hateful comments about Jews have opened the floodgates.

Brett Carlsen/Getty

Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.

After making a string of antisemitic statements, Candace Owens has left the far-right media company the Daily Wire. Headlines about the split have framed it as a disagreement between Owens and host Ben Shapiro over the Israel-Hamas conflict. Yahoo News’ headline read, “Candace Owens Exits The Daily Wire After Months of Feuding With Ben Shapiro.” The Hollywood Reporter announced, “Candace Owens Out at ‘The Daily Wire’ After Fighting With Co-Founder Over Israel-Hamas War.”

Yet the growing tension between Owens and Shapiro was more than just a more than just a foreign policy disagreement. Like many on the far right, Owens has ratcheted up her antisemitic rhetoric over the past few months. In a recent episode of her show, she said, “What if what is happening right now in Hollywood is there is just a very small ring of specific people who are using the fact that they are Jewish to shield themselves from any criticism? It’s food for thought, right?” On X, she liked a post that referenced the centuries-old blood-libel antisemitic conspiracy theory that Jews drink the blood of Christian children. The author of the post that Owens liked had asked a rabbi, “Are you drunk on Christian blood again?”

Owens is hardly a fringe lunatic—she has 4.8 million followers on X alone. Had a celebrity made these remarks just six months ago, there likely would have been a much louder outcry. But as it was, after she made the incendiary comments on her show, there only was an article in the Jerusalem Post and an opinion piece from the conservative think tank the American Enterprise Institute. Other than that, it seemed hardly anyone noticed. 

But why? In part, it’s because of a broader normalization on the far right of vitriol against Jewish people. As I wrote back in January, a main driver of this is the popular live-streamer Stew Peters:

In the past few weeks, though, Peters has dispensed with the euphemisms, instead leveling his accusations against “the Jews.” On a segment on his show last week, for example, he argued in a passionate diatribe that the United States was controlled by Jewish people. “Every institution in this country is led by somebody who claims to be a Jew,” Peters ranted to more than half a million Rumble viewers. “Are they practicing Jews? No, of course they’re not. They hide behind the Jew label so that they can get people like Elon Musk to kick me off of X for saying that they’re a Jew.” (Peters’ account has not been removed from X.)

Since then, Peters’ hate speech has only become more fervent. In addition to antisemitic statements, he has also posted slurs against people from India to his nearly 570,000 followers on X:

And Peters isn’t the only one spewing hatred against Jews. Media Matters reported that earlier this month, anti-Muslim pundit Frank Gaffney called Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) a “court Jew” and said he “was sent out to Kosher-ize, if you will, the Biden team’s antipathy towards Israel.” Meanwhile, far-right activist Laura Loomer said last month on her Rumble show, “It’s always the Jews, right?… So many rich Jews have a fixation on trying to destroy America.”

Owens, Peters, and their sympathizers are tricky to call out because they frame their hate speech as a reaction to the genuine horror of Israel’s ongoing siege of Palestine. But pro-Palestine activists have gone to great lengths to distinguish their work from far-right antisemitism. In October, when Peters just was beginning to ramp up his antisemitic extremism, I spoke to Sonya Meyerson-Knox, communications director for the Jewish Voice for Peace, a group of Jewish activists who oppose Israel’s occupation of Palestine. She described Peters and his ilk as “white nationalists with a racist agenda trying to curry favor by peddling vile forms of antisemitic trash.” She added, “We know that it’s actually not about any real care or concern for Palestinians or Jews or Israelis.”

I'm hopeful because of readers like you. Will you pitch in today?

We see the headlines on a weekly basis: the claw backs in public media, the gutting of The Washington Post, the bending over backwards to appeal to Trump and his allies.

But not here.

When Mother Jones started publishing 50 years ago, our founders made a critical decision: to be a reader-supported nonprofit. They knew that no corporate owner would be interested in a muckraking newsroom; they also knew that no muckraking newsroom would be interested in following the agenda of a corporate owner.

And so, we’ve been reader-funded for half a century. We rely on contributions from our readers—readers like you—whether it’s $50, or $15 a month, or whatever fits your budget. People give what they can, and every donation makes a difference for our newsroom, which has grown tremendously—in size and reach and renown—since its inception in 1976.

You may be wondering: What does it take to publish an investigation? And what does my donation actually fund? The answers are one and the same: It takes people, resources, and time. And that’s what your donation funds directly.

Every donation Mother Jones receives from readers fortifies our newsroom, whether we’re covering underreported scandals out of Washington, DC, or the most important news of the day. And right now, each donation will be doubled thanks to a $50,000 match. So when you make a donation, it’ll go twice as far.

Your support keeps us going. If you’re able, donate today.

Thanks for reading.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO

I'm hopeful because of readers like you. Will you pitch in today?

We see the headlines on a weekly basis: the claw backs in public media, the gutting of The Washington Post, the bending over backwards to appeal to Trump and his allies.

But not here.

When Mother Jones started publishing 50 years ago, our founders made a critical decision: to be a reader-supported nonprofit. They knew that no corporate owner would be interested in a muckraking newsroom; they also knew that no muckraking newsroom would be interested in following the agenda of a corporate owner.

And so, we’ve been reader-funded for half a century. We rely on contributions from our readers—readers like you—whether it’s $50, or $15 a month, or whatever fits your budget. People give what they can, and every donation makes a difference for our newsroom, which has grown tremendously—in size and reach and renown—since its inception in 1976.

You may be wondering: What does it take to publish an investigation? And what does my donation actually fund? The answers are one and the same: It takes people, resources, and time. And that’s what your donation funds directly.

Every donation Mother Jones receives from readers fortifies our newsroom, whether we’re covering underreported scandals out of Washington, DC, or the most important news of the day. And right now, each donation will be doubled thanks to a $50,000 match. So when you make a donation, it’ll go twice as far.

Your support keeps us going. If you’re able, donate today.

Thanks for reading.

—Monika Bauerlein, CEO

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

INDEPENDENT. BECAUSE OF YOU.

Mother Jones has no billionaires calling the shots—just readers like you making fearless reporting possible

Donate