Here are the facts: 1) We urgently need to raise $350,000 in online donations this month; 2) Readers told us fundraising is annoying; 3) Both journalism and US democracy are in trouble. So, to make this as un-annoying as possible, we’re hoping less is more right now—and we focus on three simple questions: Why us, why now, and why does your support for our journalism matter? We need a lot of help this month and can’t afford to come up short again. Please make a year-end gift if you can right now.
We need to raise $350,000 in online donations this month to keep Mother Jones charging hard. But readers told us fundraising is annoying, and we don’t want to add to the overwhelming noise. So we’re hoping less is more right now, and that we can “Let the Facts Speak for Themselves” in making the case for the year-end gifts we need. Please help if you can right now.
Investors who bought DryShips shares last fall and held on have lost almost all of their money. A $10,000 investment in DryShips stock at the beginning of November was worth $167,000 two weeks later, during the brief price spike, but only about $2 today.
For DryShips, however, the cash that poured in from Kalani for new shares put the shipper on a strong financial footing. Its net assets have soared. It has used the money from Kalani to roughly double the size of its fleet to about 36.
This whole story is bizarre and difficult to summarize. Basically, over the past few months DryShips has sold vast amounts of newly created stock at a discount price to Kalani Investments, a British Virgin Islands company that immediately resold it at the market price, thus making a profit. Meanwhile, the money they paid to DryShips for the stock helped the company expand.
Here’s what happened. Back in October, Dryships had about 10 million shares outstanding. Since then, they’ve executed reverse-splits that total up to a factor of 16,800:1. So if you owned 100,000 shares back then, today you own about six. By itself this doesn’t affect the value of the stock, but DryShips has issued such a gargantuan amount of new stock since October that it currently has 26 million shares outstanding—the equivalent of 450 billion pre-split shares. Your old 100,000 shares represented about 1 percent of the company. Your six shares today represent 0.00002 percent of the company. The effect of this massive dilution on long-term investors is obvious:
Ingmar Bueb, a 48-year-old opera singer, invested $220,000 in DryShips over the years, the bulk of his nest egg. The High Bridge, N.J., resident had hoped to use the profits from this long-term holding to build a small opera house, he said.
Already nursing losses by early November of last year, Mr. Bueb noticed the sudden price surge. “I went to the cafe to sell it, but then it was halted and crashed,” he said. He didn’t look again until he was doing his taxes this year and was shocked to discover that, because of the many reverse stock splits, he then owned only two shares. The investment now is worth less than $1.
Nobody knows how this happened. Not legally, anyway. One way or another, though, DryShips made money. Kalani made money. But all of this tanked the stock price by a fantastic amount. In some way that no one can figure out, shareholder value was legally wiped out and transformed into assets for DryShips and profits for Kalani. Nor can anyone figure out why the stock suddenly spiked 1,500 percent right after Election Day.
There’s got to be someone out there who’s smart enough to figure out how this happened. After all, someone was smart enough to create this scam in the first place.
Can you pitch in a few bucks to help fund Mother Jones' investigative journalism? We're a nonprofit (so it's tax-deductible), and reader support makes up about two-thirds of our budget.
We noticed you have an ad blocker on. Can you pitch in a few bucks to help fund Mother Jones' investigative journalism?
