Federal Judge Calls Out Trump Voting Deputy for “Pattern” of Misleading Court

Kris Kobach, the vice chair of Trump’s election commission, has been sanctioned by a court in Kansas.

Peter Foley/DPA via ZUMA Press

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis and more, subscribe to Mother Jones' newsletters.

A federal judge has found that Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, the vice chairman of President Donald Trump’s election integrity commission, has a “pattern” of providing misleading statements in court. The admonition came in an opinion on Tuesday evening upholding a lower court’s decision to sanction Kobach for misleading the court in an ongoing voting rights case.

Kobach gained a national reputation by crafting anti-immigration laws for states like Arizona and Alabama. Today he is known for making claims of widespread voter fraud, despite evidence that it is very rare. Alongside Vice President Mike Pence, he is leading Trump’s election commission, where he is expected to advocate for policies that make it more difficult for people to register to vote and easier for election officials to purge people from voter rolls. The commission is facing multiple lawsuits from civil rights groups for allegedly failing to meet federal requirements that the commission be transparent and have a balance of viewpoints among its members.

US District Court Judge Julie Robinson began her strongly worded ruling by quoting a lower court judge, US Magistrate Judge James O’Hara, who had ruled against Kobach: “When any lawyer takes an unsupportable position in a simple matter such as this, it hurts his or her credibility when the court considers arguments on much more complex and nuanced matters.” Robinson then listed other instances in which she believes Kobach made statements or took positions in court “that have called his credibility into question.” Finally, she noted that this pattern “gives further credence to Judge O’Hara’s conclusion that a sanctions award is necessary to deter defense counsel in this case from misleading the Court about the facts and record in the future.”

The ruling is part of lawsuit over a Kansas law that requires proof of citizenship in order to register to vote. The American Civil Liberties Union sued Kobach last year, alleging that the requirement violates the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), a 1993 law aimed at helping people register to vote. Kobach, a defender of the proof-of-citizenship requirement, chose to represent himself in the suit.

Shortly after the presidential election, Kobach was photographed with President-elect Donald Trump holding a memo proposing changes to the NVRA. Back in Kansas, the ACLU sought that memo and a similar document, arguing that they were relevant to the case. O’Hara ultimately agreed, and Kobach turned them over, though they remain unavailable to the public. After Kobach produced the documents, O’Hara found that Kobach had misled the court about the documents, for which he sanctioned Kobach and fined him $1,000. “[D]efendant’s deceptive conduct and lack of candor warrant the imposition of sanctions,” O’Hara wrote in his June 23 decision.

Kobach fought the sanction, arguing that “the lack of clarity was a mistake compounded by last minute editing, made in good faith.” But the editing excuse was itself raised at the last minute, not in Kobach’s initial brief opposing the sanction, and was therefore unconvincing. When O’Hara upheld the sanction, Kobach appealed to Robinson. But on Thursday, Robinson denied his request to reconsider and upheld the sanction. “Indeed, [Kobach’s] assertion in this motion for review that his editing explanation was fairly raised before Judge O’Hara in the first instance is precipitously close to unsupportable,” Robinson observed. 

 



Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.