Republicans Got a Photographer Thrown Out of the Impeachment Hearings. He Didn’t Break Any Rule.

Charges of spying were directed at a journalist doing their job.

Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) speaks during a House Judiciary Committee hearing in the Capitol.Alex Edelman/CNP via ZUMA Wire

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

A video of a photographer snapping a couple of quick photos of representatives’ belongings inside the House Judiciary Committee’s hearing room quickly went viral on conservative Twitter on Thursday afternoon. Republicans, including elected representatives, tweeted videos of him and suggested he’d done something wrong, prompting their followers to write a cascade of tweets about how he was a “spy” who should be punished.

After Republican prompting, Joshua Roberts, a Reuters photographer, was kicked out of the room. According to a congressional Democratic source familiar with the situation, the Senate Press Photographers’ Gallery, a group responsible for credentialing the Capitol’s news photographers, agreed to remove Roberts. Jessica Andrews, a spokesperson for House Judiciary Republicans, did not return Mother Jones‘ requests for comment. The Senate Press Photographers Gallery also did respond to requests for comment.

This happened without Roberts breaking any clear rule. While there are guidelines barring photographers from interfering with or bothering members, Roberts appeared to do neither and seemed to be operating within the bounds of what photographers normally do. The pictures he took were not invasive, and instead depicted what representatives had on hand as they prepared to vote on articles of impeachment. One captured Rep. Madeleine Dean’s (D-Penn.) place at the rostrum, recording the cover of a bible and a copy of the Constitution sitting on top of her computer. A similar photo recorded a picture of Rep. Jamie Raskin’s (D-Md.) dogeared copy of The Federalist Papers along side a recent edition of The Washington Post.

Political photographers have a long history of broad photographic access to committee rooms, where they have taken a wealth of different, scene-setting shots from a number of angles and perspectives that sometimes include views of officials’ documents. Roberts took the photos in clear view of uniformed officers who didn’t see any reason to stop him at the time.

Still, several Republicans on the committee including, Reps. Mike Johnson (R-La.), Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.), and Deb Lesko (R-Ariz.), tweeted about the event as though it were a scandal and potentially incriminating. Johnson and Lesko falsely accused Roberts of taking photos of what was on Republicans’ desks. Lesko even went so far as to baselessly tweet that it looked like he’d been taking a photo of her desk, even though she sits on the opposite side of the room. (Gaetz later said that the photos were actually of Democrats’ desks when speaking to the Epoch Times, a pro-Trump outlet.)

Lesko and Johnson’s tweets took off on right-wing twitter. The Arizona representative’s tweet was retweeted over 700 times and was spread even further by high-follower, right-wing accounts who quote-tweeted her. Johnson’s tweet was retweeted almost 6,000 times, and amplified further by high-profile, right-leaning, accounts like Tim Pool and the Daily Wire

By comparison, a tweet from Jesse Lee, a staffer for Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), correcting the record and stating that Roberts was actually photographing Democrats’ desks, not Republicans’, was liked a mere 5 times, and not retweeted once.

The episode isn’t the first time Gaetz has contorted normal happenings on Capitol Hill into an attention-grabbing conspiracy that he says demands action. In October, he lead a group of Republican congress members into the House Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility, or SCIF, a secure room where the Intelligence Committee meets, on the grounds that Democrats were running “Soviet-style” impeachment proceedings behind closed doors. He did this even though non-committee members are generally not allowed in the room, and even though roughly half of the committee is made up of Republicans who were authorized to enter the room and take part in the proceedings. 

These instances whipped by Gaetz fit into a larger framework of House Republicans creating, in the words of BuzzFeed News‘ Ryan Broderick, “not just a counternarrative but a completely separate reality” for the impeachment proceedings. 

“Each round of GOP questioning is not meant to interrogate the witnesses,” Broderick explained, “but instead to create moments that can be flipped into Fox News segments, shared as bite-size Facebook posts, or dropped into 4chan threads.”

While in this instance Gaetz and his allies weren’t using their questioning, they were still crafting a viral moment out of the committee room to falsely suggest that its a place where Republicans, like the president, are being unfairly targeted.

WE'LL BE BLUNT.

We have a considerable $390,000 gap in our online fundraising budget that we have to close by June 30. There is no wiggle room, we've already cut everything we can, and we urgently need more readers to pitch in—especially from this specific blurb you're reading right now.

We'll also be quite transparent and level-headed with you about this.

In "News Never Pays," our fearless CEO, Monika Bauerlein, connects the dots on several concerning media trends that, taken together, expose the fallacy behind the tragic state of journalism right now: That the marketplace will take care of providing the free and independent press citizens in a democracy need, and the Next New Thing to invest millions in will fix the problem. Bottom line: Journalism that serves the people needs the support of the people. That's the Next New Thing.

And it's what MoJo and our community of readers have been doing for 47 years now.

But staying afloat is harder than ever.

In "This Is Not a Crisis. It's The New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, why this moment is particularly urgent, and how we can best communicate that without screaming OMG PLEASE HELP over and over. We also touch on our history and how our nonprofit model makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there: Letting us go deep, focus on underreported beats, and bring unique perspectives to the day's news.

You're here for reporting like that, not fundraising, but one cannot exist without the other, and it's vitally important that we hit our intimidating $390,000 number in online donations by June 30.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. It's going to be a nail-biter, and we really need to see donations from this specific ask coming in strong if we're going to get there.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT.

We have a considerable $390,000 gap in our online fundraising budget that we have to close by June 30. There is no wiggle room, we've already cut everything we can, and we urgently need more readers to pitch in—especially from this specific blurb you're reading right now.

We'll also be quite transparent and level-headed with you about this.

In "News Never Pays," our fearless CEO, Monika Bauerlein, connects the dots on several concerning media trends that, taken together, expose the fallacy behind the tragic state of journalism right now: That the marketplace will take care of providing the free and independent press citizens in a democracy need, and the Next New Thing to invest millions in will fix the problem. Bottom line: Journalism that serves the people needs the support of the people. That's the Next New Thing.

And it's what MoJo and our community of readers have been doing for 47 years now.

But staying afloat is harder than ever.

In "This Is Not a Crisis. It's The New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, why this moment is particularly urgent, and how we can best communicate that without screaming OMG PLEASE HELP over and over. We also touch on our history and how our nonprofit model makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there: Letting us go deep, focus on underreported beats, and bring unique perspectives to the day's news.

You're here for reporting like that, not fundraising, but one cannot exist without the other, and it's vitally important that we hit our intimidating $390,000 number in online donations by June 30.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. It's going to be a nail-biter, and we really need to see donations from this specific ask coming in strong if we're going to get there.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate