Tim McDonnell

Tim McDonnell

Climate Desk Associate Producer

Tim McDonnell joined Climate Desk after stints at Mother Jones and Sierra magazine. He remains a cheerful guy despite covering climate change all the time. Originally from Tucson, Tim loves tortillas and epic walks.

Get my RSS |

Advertise on MotherJones.com

This Likely GOP Presidential Candidate Actually Believes in Global Warming

But he still might not do anything about it.

| Mon May 11, 2015 5:12 PM EDT

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, a potential contender for the Republican presidential nomination, thinks climate change is real and caused—at least in part—by human activity, according to MSNBC.

Christie said he believes there's "no use in denying global warming exists" but that he's skeptical about most of the mainstream approaches to dealing with it. That includes cap-and-trade programs and unilateral steps to reduce America's carbon footprint, such as President Barack Obama's proposed restrictions on power plant emissions.

Christie's comments essentially matched those he made in back in 2011, the last time he spoke publicly about the issue. In some respects, his position is refreshingly distinct from those of his probable rivals in 2016. Many of the GOP contenders—for example, Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, and Marco Rubio—sit somewhere on the spectrum of climate change denial. But at the same time, Christie's track record in New Jersey suggests that as president, he'd be unlikely to actually do much to confront global warming, even if he thinks it's happening. As Climate Progress put it:

As governor, Christie withdrew New Jersey from the nine-state Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), a cap-and-trade program aimed at reducing emissions, in 2011. Last year, Christie called RGGI "a completely useless plan" and said that he "would not think of rejoining it." Christie even vetoed an attempt by the New Jersey state legislature to rejoin RGGI…New Jersey also doesn't have a statewide climate change plan—the state is the only one on the eastern seaboard to not have one in place or be in the process of developing one, according to the Georgetown Climate Center.

Christie's logic—that even if climate change is real, there's nothing we can do to stop it—is out of step with mainstream science. And it ignores the growing international political momentum around climate action, which Obama has sought to lead. Moreover, if Christie thinks that kind of rhetoric is going to help him score points with Republican voters in the wake of the federal indictments handed down last week in the Bridgegate scandal, he has a long way to go: The latest polling puts Christie behind all of his serious opponents for the nomination.

Obama Okays Shell's Plan to Drill for Oil in the Arctic

"It's a dangerous folly to think that this can be done."

| Mon May 11, 2015 3:31 PM EDT
Protesters in Seattle have taken to kayaks as Shell's Arctic drilling fleet approaches the city.

Royal Dutch Shell cleared a major hurdle this afternoon when the Obama administration announced conditional approval for the company's application to drill for oil in the Chukchi Sea off Alaska's North Slope. The decision came after a few months of public comment on Shell's exploration plan, which was roundly condemned by environmental groups and several North Slope communities.

Shell's plan involves drilling for oil in a patch of ocean called the Burger Prospect. The drilling is slated to take place this summer when sea ice is at its lowest. In anticipation of this decision, two massive oil drilling ships owned by Shell are en route to a temporary dock in Seattle; from there, they are scheduled to press on to the Arctic.

If the ships make it to the planned site, it will be the first attempt Shell has made to drill in the Arctic (an area believed to hold massive subterranean reserves of oil and gas) since its disastrous effort in 2012. Back then, Shell faced a yearlong series of mishaps as it tried to navigate the icy waters, culminating in a wreck of the Kulluk, one of its main drilling ships. For many environmentalists, that botched project was a sign that Shell is ill-equipped to handle Arctic waters.

Moreover, today's decision underscored what many describe as an inconsistency in President Barack Obama's climate change policy: Despite his aggressive rhetoric on the dangers of global warming, and a suite of policies to curb the nation's carbon footprint, Obama has also pushed to expand offshore oil and gas drilling. Earlier this year, he announced a plan to limit drilling permits in some parts of the Arctic while simultaneously opening a vast new swath of the Atlantic ocean to drilling.

Allowing Shell to forge ahead with its Arctic ambitions flies in the face of the president's own climate agenda, said Franz Matzner, associate director of government affairs at the Natural Resources Defense Council.

"It's a total mystery why the Obama administration and [Interior] Secretary [Sally] Jewell are continuing down this path that is enormously risky, contradicts climate science, and is completely unnecessary to meet our energy goals," Matzner said. "It's a dangerous folly to think that this can be done."

Before Shell can start drilling, it still needs to secure a few final federal and state permits, including one that requires Shell to demonstrate how it plans to protect ocean life during drilling and in the case of a spill. Those decisions are expected within the next month or so.

A spokesperson for Shell told the New York Times: "Before operations can begin this summer, it's imperative that the remainder of our permits be practical, and delivered in a timely manner. In the meantime, we will continue to test and prepare our contractors, assets and contingency plans against the high bar stakeholders and regulators expect of an Arctic operator."

Fri Sep. 7, 2012 9:56 AM EDT
Mon Jul. 30, 2012 6:00 AM EDT
Mon Jul. 30, 2012 6:00 AM EDT
Tue Jul. 17, 2012 6:00 AM EDT
Thu May. 17, 2012 6:00 AM EDT
Fri May. 11, 2012 4:00 AM EDT
Mon May. 7, 2012 6:00 AM EDT
Mon Apr. 30, 2012 6:05 AM EDT
Thu Mar. 22, 2012 6:00 AM EDT
Mon Mar. 12, 2012 6:00 AM EDT
Fri Mar. 9, 2012 7:00 AM EST
Mon Feb. 13, 2012 7:00 AM EST
Mon Jan. 30, 2012 7:00 AM EST
Fri Jan. 6, 2012 7:00 AM EST
Mon Dec. 26, 2011 7:00 AM EST
Wed Nov. 30, 2011 5:50 PM EST
Thu Nov. 10, 2011 3:07 PM EST
Tue Nov. 1, 2011 6:00 AM EDT
Mon Oct. 10, 2011 6:00 AM EDT
Sun Aug. 28, 2011 3:38 PM EDT
Mon Aug. 22, 2011 6:40 AM EDT
Sat Aug. 13, 2011 9:01 PM EDT
Thu Aug. 11, 2011 2:28 PM EDT
Mon Aug. 8, 2011 6:00 AM EDT
Thu Jul. 14, 2011 6:00 AM EDT
Wed Jun. 29, 2011 11:59 AM EDT
Tue Jun. 28, 2011 3:14 PM EDT
Fri Jun. 24, 2011 2:49 PM EDT
Thu Jun. 23, 2011 6:00 AM EDT
Wed Jun. 22, 2011 7:30 AM EDT
Mon Jun. 13, 2011 5:37 PM EDT
Fri Jun. 10, 2011 4:38 PM EDT
Thu Jun. 9, 2011 8:10 PM EDT