The Yes Men Punk the Chamber


The Chamber of Commerce stunned DC on Monday by calling a last-minute press conference to announce a dramatic about-face in its climate policy—it would not only stop opposing the Kerry-Boxer climate bill but would work with them to make it better. But the whole thing turned out to be a hoax mounted by the Yes Men, a notorious band of anti-corporate pranksters.

Reporters received a press release early Monday stating that the Chamber would be “throwing its weight behind strong climate legislation” at an event at the National Press Club in downtown Washington, DC. But when I and others showed up, we were met by a fellow dressed in a suit looking like a typical corporate PR man. This wasn’t Chamber President and CEO Tom Donohue. And I recognized him as Yes Man Andy Bichlbaum. (I’ve written about the group previously.) He soon was telling reporters, “We at the Chamber have tried to keep climate science from interfering with business. But without a stable climate, there will be no business.”

The Yes Men posted text of the fake speech on a fake website that closely mirrors the actual Chamber site. There were a couple of tell-tale signs that there might be some funny business going on: The speech was to come from “Tom Donahue,” while the actual CEO of the Chamber is named “Tom Donohue.” And as TPM pointed out, the press release announcing the event was issued by one Erica Avidus, whose last name is Latin for “greedy.”

As one might expect, the real Chamber was none too pleased. Eric Wohlschlegel, spokesman for the US Chamber, showed up and protested loudly during the event. “This is a fraudulent press conference!” he yelled. Later he could be heard asking a Press Club employee how they could host this kind of stunt. “How could someone call and represent the Chamber in this way?” he asked. “We do a lot of events here. We’re very supportive of the Press Club.”

The Press Club wasn’t very happy either. An employee was overheard telling one of the organizers that they “could have canceled it based on your illegal behavior.”

Surely the reporters who showed up were also miffed. I initially fell for the press release, but was thankfully tipped off to the scam before the event. But reporters for Reuters, Greenwire and other news organizations showed up to cover the event, and Reuters, basing its reporting on the press release, posted a piece proclaiming that the Chamber had made an “about face” and “no longer opposes climate change legislation,” which was republished on the Washington Post and New York Times sites. National Journal took the bait as well.

Reuters ran a correction a little while later. Most reporters at the event, however, were utterly confused. “Which one is the real Chamber?” one asked.

The Yes Men, and their allies at the Avaaz Action Factory who helped coordinate the event, were pleased with the latest in their series of climate-change-related stunts. Recent efforts include a fake issue of the New York Post proclaiming “We’re Screwed!” that was distributed in New York during the United Nations Climate Summit; or their “Survivaball” system for withstanding climate change (a.k.a a “gated community for one”). Over the years, the Yes Men have honed an expertise in elaborate pranks that call attention to corporate misbehavior (see the latest issue of Mother Jones for a piece by Dave Gilson on the Yes Men’s MO and the changing role of the prank in the age of Borat). “It definitely does get attention for causes,” said Bichlbaum. “It definitely gets coverage about things, and points out obvious things. Like right now the Chamber has this troglodytic stance on climate change, completely ridiculous.”

UPDATE: It appears CNBC also bit on the fake story.

SEE ALSO:
US Chamber of Commerce responds to Yes Men hoax
A Yes Man talks to Mother Jones about the Chamber Prank
Kate Sheppard talks to Rachel Maddow about the Yes Men stunt
US Chamber spends a record $300,000 per day on lobbying

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.